Approximate Muon with low-rank adapters
arXiv:2608. 14492v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Muon optimizer shows clear benefits versus alternatives when pretraining neural networks.
The paper introduces a derivative‑free framework for Muon‑style updates, replacing gradient‑based momentum with structured finite differences. Four variants—full entrywise recovery, random low‑rank surrogates, basis‑aligned rank‑one probing, and direct structured search—are explored, with basis‑aligned probing shown to be equivalent to coordinate finite differences up to scaling. Experiments on matrix regression, noisy‑gradient regression, a neural network, and a CartPole task demonstrate that random rank‑one probing can significantly reduce function evaluations, though at the expense of update accuracy, and that accurate function values can sometimes offset unreliable gradient oracles.
arXiv:2608. 14492v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Muon optimizer shows clear benefits versus alternatives when pretraining neural networks.
arXiv:2607. 13246v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Muon has recently emerged as a strong optimizer for large-scale deep learning, where it reshapes gradient updates through approximate orthogonalization and has been reported to outperform Adam and AdamW in large language model training.
Muon has recently emerged as a strong optimizer for large-scale deep learning, where it reshapes gradient updates through approximate orthogonalization and has been reported to outperform Adam and AdamW in large language model training. Its empirical success has motivated a growing body of theoretical work that interprets Muon as steepest descent under the spectral norm.
The paper introduces low‑rank orthogonalization, a technique that exploits the low‑rank nature of gradients in neural network training to perform matrix orthogonalization more efficiently. Building on this, the authors present low‑rank matrix‑signed gradient descent (MSGD) and a low‑rank variant of the Muon optimizer, showing through experiments that low‑rank Muon matches or surpasses vanilla Muon on GPT‑2 and LLaMA pretraining, especially for larger models. Theoretical analysis provides iteration‑complexity bounds for both low‑rank MSGD and low‑rank Muon under heavy‑tailed noise.
arXiv:2604. 09967v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Muon has emerged as a promising optimizer for large-scale foundation model pre-training by exploiting the matrix structure of neural network updates through iterative orthogonalization.
arXiv:2603. 00742v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While Adam has long been the ubiquitous default optimizer for deep neural networks, Muon has recently seen rapid adoption due to its superior training speed.
arXiv:2606. 03899v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Muon has recently demonstrated strong empirical performance in large language model training, but the theoretical role of momentum in Muon remains unclear.
arXiv:2607. 01124v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Muon has recently emerged as one of the most effective optimizers for training large neural networks, yet its empirical success has been explained from several different perspectives.
arXiv:2507. 01598v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Muon, a recently proposed optimizer that leverages the inherent matrix structure of neural network parameters, has demonstrated strong empirical performance, indicating its potential as a successor to standard optimizers such as AdamW.
The paper introduces two variance‑adaptive variants of the Muon optimizer—Muon‑NSR and Muon‑VS—for language model pretraining. Both methods incorporate gradient‑variance information into Muon’s orthogonalization process without adding extra hyperparameters, preserving its spectral normalization structure. Experiments on Llama‑style and GPT‑2 models ranging from 125 M to 1.2 B parameters show that these variants outperform well‑tuned Muon baselines and achieve up to a 1.33× step‑to‑target speedup on Llama‑1.2B.
arXiv:2606. 08388v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Muon replaces a matrix gradient $G=U\Sigma V^\top$ by its polar factor $UV^\top$.
arXiv:2606. 11123v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Backpropagation (BP) is widely viewed as biologically implausible, in part because it requires feedback weights to be the transpose of forward weights for error propagation.