arXiv Machine Learning By Ben Anson, Conor Houghton, Edward Milsom

Approximate Muon with low-rank adapters

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2608. 14492v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Muon optimizer shows clear benefits versus alternatives when pretraining neural networks.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jul 16

Reassessing Muon for Matrix Factorization

arXiv:2607. 13246v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Muon has recently emerged as a strong optimizer for large-scale deep learning, where it reshapes gradient updates through approximate orthogonalization and has been reported to outperform Adam and AdamW in large language model training.

By Ali Parviz, Gal Mishne, Alex Cloninger
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 14

Reassessing Muon for Matrix Factorization

Muon has recently emerged as a strong optimizer for large-scale deep learning, where it reshapes gradient updates through approximate orthogonalization and has been reported to outperform Adam and AdamW in large language model training. Its empirical success has motivated a growing body of theoretical work that interprets Muon as steepest descent under the spectral norm.

arXiv AI
Jun 12

LoRA-Muon: Spectral Steepest Descent on the Low-Rank Manifold

arXiv:2606. 12921v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) significantly reduces compute and memory costs for finetuning Deep Learning models but is often harder to tune than dense training: when using factor-wise optimizers such as AdamW, it is sensitive to initialization choices, its optimal learning rates transfer poorly across ranks, and it often fails to beat dense baselines.

By Franz Louis Cesista, Katherine Crowson, C\'edric Simal, Stella Biderman