The paper "Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses" provides a comprehensive review of model inversion (MI) attacks that exploit trained deep neural networks to reconstruct private training data. It traces the evolution of MI from early machine‑learning contexts to recent DNN‑based attacks across various modalities and learning tasks, offering a detailed taxonomy and comparative analysis of both attacks and defenses. The authors also present an open‑source toolbox on GitHub to support further research in this area.
By Hao Fang, Yixiang Qiu, Hongyao Yu, Wenbo Yu, Jiawei Kong, Baoli Chong, Bin Chen, Xuan Wang, Shu-Tao Xia, Ke Xu
arXiv:2411. 10023v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep neural networks have enabled numerous studies and applications on both Euclidean data, such as images and text, and non-Euclidean data, such as graphs.
By Zhanke Zhou, Jianing Zhu, Fengfei Yu, Xuan Li, Xiong Peng, Tongliang Liu, Bo Han
arXiv:2608. 13773v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural networks are increasingly deployed in high-stakes applications with growing privacy leakage concerns.
By Leonardo Magliolo, Vito Paolo Pastore, Giuseppe Valenzise, Enzo Tartaglione
arXiv:2407. 04884v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The hidden state threat model of differential privacy (DP) assumes that the adversary has access only to the final trained machine learning (ML) model, without seeing intermediate states during training.
By Rob Romijnders, Antti Koskela
arXiv:2410. 06814v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Over-parameterized models are typically vulnerable to membership inference attacks, which aim to determine whether a specific sample is included in the training of a given model.
By Hengxiang Zhang, Qiang Hu, Hongxin Wei
The paper demonstrates that a single poisoned data point can successfully create a backdoor in linear models and ReLU neural networks without needing detailed knowledge of the training data. It establishes provable conditions under which this one‑poison attack works with high probability, achieving zero backdooring error while leaving the model’s normal performance largely unaffected. The attack relies only on coarse geometric bounds of the input space and training parameters.
By Thorsten Peinemann, Paula Arnold, Sebastian Berndt, Thomas Eisenbarth, Esfandiar Mohammadi
arXiv:2511.21799v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Real-world machine learning (ML) pipelines rarely produce a single model; instead, they produce a Rashomon set of many near-optimal ones. We show t...
By Ethan Hsu, Harry Chen, Chudi Zhong, Lesia Semenova
arXiv:2412. 12640v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The increasing demand for data privacy, alongside the benefits of aggregating data from networked devices, has catalyzed the emergence of federated learning (FL).
By Rui Zhang, Ka-Ho Chow
arXiv:2409. 01062v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Model Inversion (MI) attacks pose a significant privacy threat by reconstructing private training data from machine learning models.
By Viet-Hung Tran, Ngoc-Bao Nguyen, Son T. Mai, Hans Vandierendonck, Ira Assent, Alex Kot, Ngai-Man Cheung
Batch Normalization (BN) is widely used to speed up and stabilize deep neural network training, yet its effect on privacy and memorization has been largely unexplored. This study shows that BN significantly increases the memorization of atypical or outlier samples, as evidenced by unintended memorization, per-sample influence, and heightened susceptibility to membership inference attacks across multiple datasets and architectures. A mechanistic analysis of the BN backward pass reveals that BN amplifies the per‑step margin growth of outlier samples during training, thereby intensifying their influence.
By Ngoc Phu Doan, Chongyan Gu, Ihsen Alouani
arXiv:2606. 04069v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing privacy analyses for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) largely inherit assumptions from non-graph settings, overlooking structural correlations and stochastic training-graph sampling.
By Sinan Y{\i}ld{\i}r{\i}m, Megha Khosla
The paper presents an empirical audit of privacy leakage in edge‑private graph generators by testing whether outputs from edge‑neighbouring inputs remain distinguishable. It introduces statistically valid lower bounds on privacy loss and compares direct‑edge, local‑structural, and GNN‑based attacks based on the geometry around a target edge. Experiments on two generators and two networks reveal that privacy leakage varies with both the mechanism and the network, and that learned representations expose information beyond conventional local statistics.
By Anum Fatima, Stratis Limnios, James Adams, Lukasz Szpruch, Carsten Maple, Gesine Reinert, Andrew Elliott