arXiv Machine Learning By Zhanke Zhou, Jianing Zhu, Fengfei Yu, Xuan Li, Xiong Peng, Tongliang Liu, Bo Han

Model Inversion Attacks: A Survey of Approaches and Countermeasures

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2411. 10023v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep neural networks have enabled numerous studies and applications on both Euclidean data, such as images and text, and non-Euclidean data, such as graphs.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 21

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

The paper "Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses" provides a comprehensive review of model inversion (MI) attacks that exploit trained deep neural networks to reconstruct private training data. It traces the evolution of MI from early machine‑learning contexts to recent DNN‑based attacks across various modalities and learning tasks, offering a detailed taxonomy and comparative analysis of both attacks and defenses. The authors also present an open‑source toolbox on GitHub to support further research in this area.

By Hao Fang, Yixiang Qiu, Hongyao Yu, Wenbo Yu, Jiawei Kong, Baoli Chong, Bin Chen, Xuan Wang, Shu-Tao Xia, Ke Xu
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

Are LLM-Enhanced GNNs Privacy-Safe?

The paper evaluates privacy risks in graph neural networks enhanced by large language models (LLMs). Using a five‑stage framework, the authors test six real‑world text‑attributed graph datasets with 42 model configurations and six privacy attack methods across link, label, and membership inference threats. Results show that LLM‑enhanced GNNs are more vulnerable than shallow baselines, with semantic enrichment amplifying exploitable signals, and that differential privacy can reduce risk but at a significant cost to utility.

By Longzhu He, Zelang Wen, Chaozhuo Li, Sen Su