Split learning enables collaborative model training by partitioning neural networks across clients and servers. However, improper split placement can lead to severe privacy leakage through intermediate representations.
arXiv:2607. 24556v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Split learning enables collaborative model training by partitioning neural networks across clients and servers.
By Akarsh K. Nair, Muhammad Arifur Rahman, David Brown, Mufti Mahmud
arXiv:2410. 06814v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Over-parameterized models are typically vulnerable to membership inference attacks, which aim to determine whether a specific sample is included in the training of a given model.
By Hengxiang Zhang, Qiang Hu, Hongxin Wei
arXiv:2607. 19580v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Differentially private machine learning enables model training on sensitive data while ensuring that individual data is unlikely to be recoverable from the parameters of the resulting model.
By Huaiyuan Rao, Calvin Hawkins, Alexander Benvenuti, Matthew Hale
arXiv:2506. 01396v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Differential privacy (DP) has become an essential framework for privacy-preserving machine learning.
By Linzh Zhao, Aki Rehn, Mikko A. Heikkil\"a, Razane Tajeddine, Antti Honkela
arXiv:2412. 12640v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The increasing demand for data privacy, alongside the benefits of aggregating data from networked devices, has catalyzed the emergence of federated learning (FL).
By Rui Zhang, Ka-Ho Chow
arXiv:2407. 08233v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Current differentially private learning paradigms face a severe utility bottleneck: DP-SGD degrades performance through noise accumulation over training steps, while aggregation-based approaches such as PATE suffer from data inefficiency due to disjoint data partitioning.
By Ding Chen, Haochen Luo, Xiaofei Wang, Chen Liu
arXiv:2512. 12840v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vertical Federated Learning (VFL) enables collaborative model training across organizations that share common user samples but hold disjoint feature spaces.
By Sindhuja Madabushi, Haider Ali, Ahmad Faraz Khan, Rui Ning, Hongyi Wu, Chunsheng Xin, Ali. R. Butt, Jin-Hee Cho
arXiv:2606. 16952v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred interest in synthetic data as a privacy-preserving alternative to sensitive real-world datasets.
By Kareem Amin, Rudrajit Das, Alessandro Epasto, Adel Javanmard, Dennis Kraft, M\'onica Ribero, Sergei Vassilvitskii
arXiv:2405. 16361v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: To protect privacy in regulated domains such as healthcare and finance, model owners may allow only remote API access while keeping both the training data and model parameters private.
By Kexin Li, Aastha Mehta, David Lie
arXiv:2606. 17110v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models are increasingly trained on proprietary or sensitive data, from private healthcare and financial records to user conversations containing secrets.
By Md Abdullah Al Mamun, Ngoc Phu Doan, Pedram Zaree, Ihsen Alouani, Nael Abu-Ghazaleh
arXiv:2608. 04255v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph inference over relational data can expose sensitive edge information, and this risk becomes more severe in dynamic graphs, where repeated model updates cause privacy loss to accumulate.
By Yuyang Xia, Ruixuan Liu, Li Xiong