arXiv Machine Learning
The Double-Edged Nature of the Rashomon Set for Trustworthy Machine Learning
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 17
Loss Landscape Poisoning: Targeted Extraction of Unseen Training Data from LLMs
arXiv:2606. 17110v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models are increasingly trained on proprietary or sensitive data, from private healthcare and financial records to user conversations containing secrets.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 15
Reducing information dependency does not cause training data privacy. Adversarially non-robust features do
arXiv:2607. 12354v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this paper, we challenge the prevailing view that information dependency (including rote memorization) drives training data exposure to image reconstruction attacks.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1
Revisiting the Provable-Auditable Privacy Gap of DP-SGD
arXiv:2608.28934v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Differential privacy (DP) has traditionally been used to provide theoretical upper bounds on an algorithm's stability to changing its training data. In...
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 15
Private Prediction via PAC Privacy
arXiv:2601. 14033v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine learning models are increasingly served behind APIs.
arXiv AI
Jul 22
Phantoms and Disclosures: A Statistical Framework for Auditing Privacy in Synthetic Data
arXiv:2606. 16952v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred interest in synthetic data as a privacy-preserving alternative to sensitive real-world datasets.
arXiv AI
Jul 7
TIER: Trajectory-Invariant Explanation Regularization for Membership Privacy
arXiv:2607. 02903v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Explainability is central to building trustworthy AI, yet explanation interfaces can inadvertently provide adversaries with an expanded privacy-related attack surfaces.