arXiv:2412.03044v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Video anomaly detection (VAD) is a vital yet complex open-set task in computer vision, commonly tackled through reconstruction-based methods. Howev...
By Xiaofeng Tan, Hongsong Wang, Xin Geng, Liang Wang
arXiv:2608. 01793v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Unified anomaly detection requires modeling highly heterogeneous normal data without access to anomalous samples.
By Camile Lendering, Erkut Akdag, Joaqu\'in Figueira, Egor Bondarev
arXiv:2606. 15280v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most existing anomaly detection methods rely on estimating a probability density or learning an enclosing decision boundary, implicitly assuming that normal data occupies a region of non-zero volume in the ambient space.
By Alexander Bauer
arXiv:2601. 18823v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Variational autoencoders (VAE) encode data into lower-dimensional latent vectors before decoding those vectors back to data.
By Alejandro Ascarate, Leo Lebrat, Rodrigo Santa Cruz, Clinton Fookes, Olivier Salvado
arXiv:2609.37314v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Synthetic anomaly generation helps expand industrial anomaly datasets when real defects are scarce or unavailable. Existing approaches lie at two extre...
By Abhay Kumar Das, Rajesh Gangireddy, Ashwin Vaidya, Samet Akcay
The paper investigates why reconstruction-based unsupervised learning can fail, identifying two failure modes: over‑reconstruction of anomalies and loss of nominal variation. Using the Pursuit of Subspaces hypothesis, it links these failures to geometric properties—join blindness from excess range and meet preference from insufficient capacity—and shows that a compact nominal union is optimal, typically requiring a nonlinear reconstruction map. The authors propose Dynamic Push and Pull, along with nested manifold carving, to learn compact representations without anomaly labels, and demonstrate improved anomaly detection on standard benchmarks, unseen image degradations, and ECG classification.
By Mehmet Yama\c{c}, Yagmur Mustu, Muhammad Numan Yousaf, Lei Xu, Marcel van Gerven
arXiv:2507. 21164v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Unsupervised anomaly detection (UAD) aims to detect anomalies without labeled data, a necessity in many machine learning applications where anomalous samples are rare or not available.
By Nicolas Pinon (MYRIAD), Robin Trombetta (MYRIAD), Carole Lartizien (MYRIAD)
arXiv:2606. 07660v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Adapting foundation models to detect generative artifacts via gradient-based updates compromises their intrinsic representations.
By Qiaoyu Chen, Bing Zhang
arXiv:2606. 29181v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Detecting and localizing defects in 3D point clouds is challenging because abnormal samples are scarce and diverse, while training is often limited to normal data.
By Ali Balapour, Faraz Hach
arXiv:2604. 19191v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deploying AI-based anomaly detection across diverse clinical imaging settings remains challenging because most existing methods rely on modality-specific architectures, anatomical priors, or extensive retraining, limiting their use as general-purpose screening tools.
By Pritam Kar, Gouri Lakshmi S, Saptarshi Bej
The paper introduces a variational template matching framework for anomaly detection in patterned structures, representing anomaly templates as transformed instances and using normalized cross‑correlation across the transformation space. It enhances robustness by adding a density‑based statistical anomaly score derived from local intensity distributions via kernel density estimation, which captures distributional concentration and tail behavior more effectively than histogram methods. The structural and statistical cues are fused in a unified formulation, and experiments on biological cell images show the method outperforms classical baselines and rivals ResNet‑50 while remaining fully training‑free and providing explicit localization.
By Qinwu Xu, Yifan Jiang
The paper introduces TSR-ITNR, a two‑stage, self‑supervised framework for hyperspectral image super‑resolution that fuses high‑resolution multispectral and low‑resolution hyperspectral data. Stage 1 refines an implicit Tucker representation using a low‑rank spatial tensor and spectral basis, enhanced by a pretrained denoiser, to capture fine spatial details and spectral correlations. Stage 2 applies parameter‑free calibration to extract complementary corrections from both observations, preserving geometry and ensuring orthogonal complementarity, leading to superior reconstruction quality demonstrated on benchmark datasets and improved downstream segmentation performance.
By Liqian Yang, Xingchi Chen, Xinfeng Gui, Xiangyong Cao, Qianxin Yi