arXiv Machine Learning

Rethinking Structural Anomaly Detection: From Decision Boundaries to Projection Operators

arXiv:2606. 15280v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most existing anomaly detection methods rely on estimating a probability density or learning an enclosing decision boundary, implicitly assuming that normal data occupies a region of non-zero volume in the ambient space.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

When Does Unsupervised Learning Succeed or Fail? A PoS Perspective on Reconstruction-Based Anomaly Detection

The paper investigates why reconstruction-based unsupervised learning can fail, identifying two failure modes: over‑reconstruction of anomalies and loss of nominal variation. Using the Pursuit of Subspaces hypothesis, it links these failures to geometric properties—join blindness from excess range and meet preference from insufficient capacity—and shows that a compact nominal union is optimal, typically requiring a nonlinear reconstruction map. The authors propose Dynamic Push and Pull, along with nested manifold carving, to learn compact representations without anomaly labels, and demonstrate improved anomaly detection on standard benchmarks, unseen image degradations, and ECG classification.

By Mehmet Yama\c{c}, Yagmur Mustu, Muhammad Numan Yousaf, Lei Xu, Marcel van Gerven
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Can We Predict Anomaly Detection Performance from Embedding-Space Geometry?

The paper investigates whether the performance of anomaly detection systems can be predicted without labeled anomalies. For kNN-based detectors, it derives a lower bound on AUC that links detection performance to the separation and variance of inlier and outlier scores, and uses this to analyze how density variation, intrinsic dimensionality, and domain mismatch affect score variability. The authors introduce pseudo‑anomaly probes that provide a reference for estimating relative score separation, and demonstrate through experiments on DCASE benchmarks that these probes enable anomaly‑free model selection to outperform conventional development‑set selection, especially under domain shift.

By Kevin Wilkinghoff, Zheng-Hua Tan
arXiv AI
Jun 4

TPA-AD: A Two-Stage Pseudo Anomaly-Guided Method for Bearing Time-Series Anomaly Detection

arXiv:2606. 04073v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper proposes a two-stage pseudo anomaly-guided anomaly detection method (\textbf{T}wo-stage \textbf{P}seudo \textbf{A}nomaly-guided \textbf{A}nomaly \textbf{D}etection, \textbf{TPA-AD}) for axle-box bearing time-series anomaly detection (time series anomaly detection, TSAD) under the setting where only normal samples are available for training.

By Xiancheng Wang, Zhibo Zhang, Ran Li, Rui Wang, Minghang Zhao, Shisheng Zhong, Lin Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Variational Template Matching with Statistical Fusion for Anomaly Detection in Patterned Structures

The paper introduces a variational template matching framework for anomaly detection in patterned structures, representing anomaly templates as transformed instances and using normalized cross‑correlation across the transformation space. It enhances robustness by adding a density‑based statistical anomaly score derived from local intensity distributions via kernel density estimation, which captures distributional concentration and tail behavior more effectively than histogram methods. The structural and statistical cues are fused in a unified formulation, and experiments on biological cell images show the method outperforms classical baselines and rivals ResNet‑50 while remaining fully training‑free and providing explicit localization.

By Qinwu Xu, Yifan Jiang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 28

Anomaly Factory 3D: A Modular Framework for Diverse Pseudo-Anomaly Synthesis in Unsupervised 3D Anomaly Detection

Detecting and localizing defects in 3D point clouds is challenging because abnormal samples are scarce and diverse, while training is often limited to normal data. We propose Anomaly Factory 3D (AF3AD), a modular framework that synthesizes diverse pseudo-anomalies from normal point clouds to expand the training data for unsupervised 3D anomaly detection methods that rely on pseudo-anomalies.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

Multi-Modal Anomaly Detection: A Survey

The paper surveys Multi‑Modal Anomaly Detection (MMAD), a field that identifies rare abnormal events across heterogeneous data sources used in safety‑critical domains like industrial inspection and cybersecurity. It formalizes MMAD, outlines five core characteristics, and categorizes existing methods into normality‑assumption and anomaly‑assumption paradigms, highlighting how foundation models are reshaping the field. The survey also compiles benchmarks, evaluation protocols, and identifies open problems for developing robust, adaptive, and interpretable MMAD systems.

By Xudong Mou, Zexin Wu, Chuan Luo, Shiru Chen, Xudong Liu, Chunming Hu, Renyu Yang
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 4

Neural-Collapse-guided Task-Free Continual Anomaly Detection

The paper introduces NC‑TFAD, a task‑free continual anomaly detection framework that leverages neural‑collapse geometry to learn from non‑stationary data streams without task boundaries. It freezes a pretrained backbone, aligns streaming features to a simplex Equiangular Tight Frame prototype space, and uses synthetic anomaly anchors, inter‑ and intra‑class regularization, and a Focal Neural Collapse Contrastive loss to stabilize representations and enhance normal‑anomaly separability. A normal‑patch‑prototype‑guided localization branch generates calibrated anomaly heatmaps, and extensive experiments on MVTec AD and VisA demonstrate that NC‑TFAD outperforms existing task‑free continual learning and unified anomaly detection baselines in both image‑level detection and pixel‑level localization.

By Xiaotong Kong, Chaoyang Song, Ziai Zhou, Jinxia Zhang, Kanjian Zhang, Haikun Wei