arXiv:2606. 25000v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: To evaluate whether vision-language models can reason about geological histories, it is necessary to construct observations for which the underlying process history is known.
By Lukas Mosser
arXiv:2605. 03383v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Geological interpretation infers subsurface properties and structures from indirect geophysical observations.
By Xiaoyu Tao, Mingyue Cheng, Jiahao Wang, Yitong Zhou, Qingyang Mao, Yimin Dou, Qi Liu, Shijin Wang, Enhong Chen
arXiv:2607. 22408v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The renewed global focus on lunar exploration, driven by the prospect of in-situ resource utilization and a sustained human presence on the Moon, has created growing demand for accurate, large-scale characterization of the lunar surface.
By Marc Girona-Mata, Jakob Gawlikowski, Sumit Goski, Gautier Bardi de Fourtou, Valentin T. Bickel, Ben Moseley, Abigail Calzada-Diaz, Sylvester Kaczmarek, Ra\'ul Ramos-Poll\'an
arXiv:2607. 24984v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In recent years, the number of events in earthquake catalogs has significantly increased due to the utilization of more effective deep learning based detectors and phase pickers but answering open ended questions such as what characterizes this sequence?
By Yuxin Zhou, Huai Zhang, S. Mostafa Mousavi
arXiv:2605. 24844v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While general-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs) applied to Geology often hallucinate when reasoning about subsurface structures and deep-time evolution, current AI in Earth sciences predominantly targets surface remote sensing and GIS.
By Chenyou Guo, Zongqi Liu, Yizhou Zhang, Zhaorui Jiang, Ze Liu
arXiv:2605. 00972v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Earth system science is producing increasingly large, high-dimensional datasets from both physics-based and AI-driven models.
By Nihanth W. Cherukuru, Matt Rehme, Kirsten J. Mayer, David John Gagne, John Schreck, John Clyne, Charlie Becker