arXiv:2602. 01357v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Self-play post-training methods has emerged as an effective approach for finetuning large language models and turn the weak language model into strong language model without preference data.
arXiv:2509. 23102v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as the standard paradigm for aligning large language models with human preferences.
arXiv:2607. 10601v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents are commonly trained from expert trajectories using supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which treats multi-turn agent behavior as ordinary text imitation.
arXiv:2606. 01382v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Preference alignment is central to improving large language models, but standard reward-based formulations can be restrictive when human preferences are cyclic, non-transitive, or otherwise not representable by a scalar reward.
arXiv:2610.15008v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models are frequently aligned to human preferences via imperfect evaluators whose errors can be exploited during optimization. We train polici...
The paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) can be trained to cooperate in multi‑agent social dilemmas. It shows that standard reinforcement learning often leads LLM agents to defect and exploit others, even when they have cooperative priors. By adapting the Advantage Alignment algorithm and introducing a group‑relative baseline, the authors fine‑tune LLMs to achieve higher collective payoffs and resist exploitation, and they present a new Trust‑and‑Split environment that requires natural language communication for optimal outcomes.
The paper introduces PARED, an approach that uses inverse reinforcement learning to derive an explicit, interpretable reward from expert demonstrations. By training a lightweight discriminator on response-level features, PARED can guide both inference-time reranking and on-policy reinforcement learning, improving alignment for models that have not undergone supervised fine-tuning and further refining those that have. The method also supports contextual alignment, enabling a single policy to adapt its responses to different audience preferences.
arXiv:2506. 07468v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Conventional large language model (LLM) safety alignment relies on a reactive, disjoint loop: attackers exploit a static model, then defenders patch exposed vulnerabilities.
arXiv:2607. 26094v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is the standard approach for aligning large language models with human preferences, but its quality is limited by static, task-agnostic reward models.
arXiv:2606. 01561v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences is often formulated via Direct Preference Optimization (DPO).
arXiv:2607. 07859v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) research has increasingly shifted focus towards alignment, ensuring agents learn behaviors adhering to human values.
arXiv:2601.08777v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Aligning large language models (LLMs) to serve users with heterogeneous and potentially conflicting preferences is a central challenge for pe...
arXiv:2503.00030v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Self-play-based policy optimization has emerged as an effective approach for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs), formulating preference...