arXiv Machine Learning

Optimization-Embedded Active Multi-Fidelity Surrogate Learning for Multi-Condition Airfoil Shape Optimization

arXiv:2603. 17057v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Active multi-fidelity surrogate modeling is developed for multi-condition airfoil shape optimization to reduce high-fidelity CFD cost while retaining RANS-consistent aerodynamic metrics.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

A Data Fusion Framework for Grounding Aerospace Surrogate Model via Experimental Wind-Tunnel Observations

The paper introduces a correction framework that grounds a CFD-trained deep learning surrogate model for aerospace aerodynamics using wind‑tunnel pressure‑sensor (PSP) data. By training a correction network on spatially registered PSP measurements at two Mach numbers, the authors adjust the surrogate’s predictions without retraining its core parameters, achieving improved agreement with experimental pressure distributions—especially at the wing suction peak and shock location. The grounded surrogate matches measurements within 2.3–2.7% of the Cp range on unseen angles of attack and outperforms simple interpolation between measured states.

By Nitin Nagesh Kulkarni, Dheeraj Vemula, Yin Yu, Peter Lyu, Juan J. Alonso
arXiv Machine Learning
2d ago

Airfoil2Vec: Spectral Geometry-Conditioned Neural Surrogate Models for Airfoil Aerodynamics and a Downforce-Generating CFD Dataset

arXiv:2609.38213v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce a dataset of approximately 10,000 Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations of steady, incompressible, two-dimensional subsonic...

By Haitz S\'aez de Oc\'ariz Borde, Flavio Savarino, Andrei Cristian Popescu, Pietro Innocenzi, Pantelis Papageorgiou, Xerxes Xian Chong
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

How Does Distribution Shift Shape Pretraining Gains in Neural PDE Surrogates?

The study investigates how distribution shift influences the benefits of pretraining neural PDE surrogates for computational fluid dynamics. Researchers pretrained a model on 254,909 RANS solutions from one airfoil family and fine‑tuned it on a new family under two target settings—identical Spalart‑Allmaras (SA) modeling and SA with added $e^N$ transition modeling—while keeping freestream ranges matched. Results show that at 1,000 fine‑tuning samples, the pretrained model matches a from‑scratch model trained on 3.25× more data for the same‑SA target and 2.58× more for the transition‑modeled target; by 5,000 samples the advantage reverses. Additionally, increasing the number of distinct airfoils in the fine‑tuning set reduces error for both targets, but the improvement is significant only for the same‑SA case.

By Pochinapeddi Sai Bhargav, Nithin Somasekharan, Rohit Sunil Kanchi, Sicheng He, Shaowu Pan