arXiv:2602. 23499v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Collecting a high-quality dataset is a critical task that demands meticulous attention to detail, as overlooking certain aspects can render the entire dataset unusable.
By Tugrul Gorgulu, Atakan Dag, M. Esat Kalfaoglu, Halil Ibrahim Kuru, Baris Can Cam, Halil Ibrahim Ozturk, Ozsel Kilinc
The paper reviews end‑to‑end autonomous driving (E2E‑AD) training, framing it as a Data‑Strategy‑Platform system. It surveys recent advances in data pipelines, learning paradigms, and training infrastructures, and discusses how these layers interact to influence model performance, robustness, and deployability. The authors highlight current limitations and propose a future vision that prioritizes data value, foundation‑driven generalization, and integrated training‑testing loops for more robust, scalable, and trustworthy autonomous driving systems.
By Chengkai Xu, Yiming Cui, Jiaqi Liu, Yicheng Guo, Cheng Qin, Geyuan Zhang, Xinwei Dong, Shiyu Fang, Peng Hang, Jian Sun
arXiv:2511. 14592v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) show great promise for autonomous driving, but their suitability for safety-critical scenarios is largely unexplored, raising safety concerns.
By Xianhui Meng, Yuchen Zhang, Zhijian Huang, Zheng Lu, Ziling Ji, Yandan Lin, Yaoyao Yin, Hongyuan Zhang, Wei Zhou, Guangfeng Jiang, Li Zhang, Long Chen, Hangjun Ye, Jun Liu, Xiaoshuai Hao
The paper introduces a multi-vehicle dataset that includes camera, LiDAR, and radar sensor data along with scanned 3D models of all vehicles. Each vehicle’s pose and continuous kinematics are provided via RTK‑GNSS, enabling precise knowledge of the dynamic surroundings at any time. The dataset supports single‑ and multi‑object recordings with seven target vehicles, allowing evaluation of measurement effects such as occlusion and reflections thanks to known vehicle surface normals.
By Philipp Berthold, Bianca Forkel, Mirko Maehlisch
The paper surveys one‑stage object detectors for autonomous driving, covering the evolution from early models like YOLOv1 and SSD to recent real‑time architectures such as YOLOv10 and anchor‑free detectors like FCOS and CenterNet. It compares these methods on design choices, feature‑fusion strategies, loss functions, deployment trade‑offs, and benchmark performance, while also summarizing datasets, evaluation metrics, open challenges, and future research directions. The survey emphasizes how one‑stage detectors balance speed, accuracy, efficiency, and robustness, noting the gap between benchmark results and dependable real‑world performance.
By Jonel Roman, Ryan Sirjue, Peter Nguyen, Daniel Krutky, Juan Jesus, Sudip Dhakal
arXiv:2607. 23910v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cooperative perception through vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication can overcome the inherent physical limitations of individual autonomous vehicles, such as occlusions and limited sensor range.
By Goodarz Mehr, Sepideh Gohari, Montasir Abbas, Azim Eskandarian
arXiv:2606. 02979v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a novel compact deep multi-task learning model to handle various autonomous driving perception tasks in one forward pass.
By Oskar Natan, Jun Miura
The paper introduces FlexDepth, a family of self‑supervised monocular depth estimation models designed for robust driving perception. FlexDepth uses a two‑stage static‑dynamic decoupled training strategy and a Scale‑Driven Decoder that selects components based on scale size, enabling efficient feature fusion and high‑precision depth maps. Experiments on driving benchmarks show state‑of‑the‑art performance across arbitrary scales with minimal computational cost, with the smallest model (Flex‑Nano) achieving 37.6 FPS on mobile devices.
By Zhaowen Zhu, Li Zhang, Yujie Chen, Tian Zhang, Yingjie Wang, Mingxia Zhan
The paper introduces AdaptAV, a system that continuously adapts vision models for autonomous vehicles by retraining them on the cloud using data uploaded from the vehicles. It leverages powerful cloud compute resources and a highly accurate oracle model to guide the retraining process, producing a new model that is then transmitted back to the vehicle. This approach aims to improve inference accuracy over time while maintaining the fast inference speeds required for on‑vehicle deployment.
By Yuheng Zhu, Dhruva Ungrupulithaya, Boluo Ge, Man-Ki Yoon
The paper introduces a lightweight LiDAR-only perception pipeline for Formula Student Driverless vehicles that runs entirely on CPU. It combines ground removal, IMU-based motion compensation, DBSCAN clustering, and a Random Forest classifier, reducing the feature set from 12 to 7 while maintaining high accuracy. On a dataset of 2,371 labeled clusters, the system achieves an F1-score of 98.33% with an end-to-end runtime of 3.13 ms.
By M\'ark Mez\H{o}-Kerekes, P\'eter Praksz, Chang Liu
The paper introduces a plug‑and‑play method that injects traffic‑element signals—such as traffic lights and road signs—into end‑to‑end autonomous driving models with minimal architectural changes. By augmenting several public datasets with comprehensive traffic‑element annotations, the authors evaluate this integration across diverse driving paradigms, consistently improving performance on nuScenes, NAVSIM‑v1, NAVSIM‑v2, and Bench2Drive. The approach achieves a new state‑of‑the‑art result on the challenging NAVSIM‑v2 benchmark, demonstrating the broad utility of traffic‑element awareness.
arXiv:2608.29929v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vehicle attribute recognition is an important task in intelligent transportation systems, particularly when Automatic License Plate Recognition (ALPR)...
By Alexandre V. Delazeri, Gabriel E. Lima, Eduil Nascimento Jr, Rayson Laroca, David Menotti