The paper examines how large language models (LLMs) can assess whether recipes are suitable for people with diabetes. It introduces a benchmark of 7,607 recipes, split evenly between suitable and unsuitable, and tests three prompting strategies that embed varying levels of diabetes dietary guidelines. Results show that LLMs tend to be cautious in labeling recipes as suitable, and those that can reason with the guidelines—particularly Mistral‑7B and Llama‑70B—perform best.
arXiv:2412.15957v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has transformed many industries, including healthcare. In practice, hospitals and patie...
By Ruize Shi, Hong Huang, Wei Zhou, Kehan Yin, Kai Zhao, Yun Zhao
arXiv:2606. 10120v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Postprandial hyperglycemia is a key risk factor for metabolic disorders; however, existing dietary guidance is often static, impractical, and insufficiently personalized, providing recommendations that are difficult to follow or not impactful.
By Asiful Arefeen, Carol Johnston, Hassan Ghasemzadeh
The paper investigates how well large language models (LLMs) can assess whether recipes are suitable for people with diabetes. It introduces a benchmark of 7,607 recipes, split evenly between suitable and unsuitable, and tests three prompting strategies that vary in how much diabetes dietary guidance they provide. Results show that LLMs tend to be cautious in labeling recipes as suitable, and those that can reason with dietary guidelines—particularly Mistral‑7B and Llama‑70B—perform best.
By Revathy Venkataramanan, Aditya Luthra, Venkatesan Nadimuthu, Amit Sheth
arXiv:2605. 18937v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Patient-managed Personal Health Records (PHRs) promises to empower patients to better understand their health; but information in the record is complex, potentially hindering insights.
By Rory Sayres, Kejia Chen, Ayush Jain, Matthew Thompson, Jonathan Richina, Xiang Yin, Jimmy Hu, Fan Zhang, Bob Lou, Mike Sanchez, Ines Mezerreg, Meredith Schreier, Hamsa Subramaniam, I-Ching Lee, Yugang Jia, Daniel Mcduff, Yossi Matias, Avinatan Hassidim, Dale Webster, Yun Liu, Jackie Barr, Quang Duong
arXiv:2603. 09995v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Behavioral interview evaluation using large language models presents unique challenges that require structured assessment, realistic interviewer behavior simulation, and pedagogical value for candidate training.
By Kewen Zhu, Zixi Liu, Yanjing Li, Jing Chen
arXiv:2608.21721v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Correcting health misinformation in dialogue requires more than producing a factual rebuttal: users differ in what they know, what they believe, and wh...
By Xiaoying Song, Anirban Saha Anik, Jinyu Liu, Qitao Tan, Geng Yuan, Lingzi Hong
The paper introduces a clinician‑grounded evaluation platform called InterviewPlayground, which uses a memory‑augmented patient simulator to assess AI‑assisted psychiatric intake systems. It supports comparison across different interviewing styles, reduces clinician workload, and measures clinically relevant performance. In a pilot study, a GPT‑based intake interviewer captured more relevant items but made more unfounded inferences and missed safety concerns compared to clinicians.
By King Shi, Amanda Li, Jonathan Ivey, Synthia Qia Wang, Guan Gui, Hyunseo Kim, Peter Zandi, Jason Straub, Jacob Taylor, Ananya Joshi
arXiv:2609.22171v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Precision healthcare, particularly for conditions like hypertension and cardiovascular disease, necessitates monitoring of dietary sodium intake. How...
By Mingyu Huang, Weiqing Min, Yuehui Fang, Yuna He, Shuqiang Jiang
The paper introduces a prompt‑engineering framework that personalizes large language model (LLM) teaching assistants across disciplines by tailoring responses to six learner‑specific dimensions, creating 96 distinct learner profiles. It also analyzes student queries through Bloom’s Taxonomy to gauge cognitive complexity, encoding both learner attributes and cognitive assessments into structured prompts that condition the LLM without retraining. Experiments using NLP metrics and a small human study demonstrate that this approach yields perceptible differences in response style and structure, with statistical evidence linking specific learner attributes to measurable changes.
By Saptarshi Basu, Sandeep Kakar, Ashok Goel
The paper investigates how persona prompting—using short textual descriptions of individuals—to align large language models (LLMs) with human survey responses. It examines the impact of selecting different persona attributes and finds that not all attribute combinations improve performance, suggesting that the variation in human responses to survey questions may explain mixed results. The study evaluates multiple attribute selection methods across four social surveys, two countries, six LLMs, and twenty prediction tasks, offering guidance on when persona prompting is beneficial and which attribute choices are most effective.
By Leon Fr\"ohling, Jens Rupprecht, Markus Strohmaier, Claudia Wagner
arXiv:2608. 12062v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Developing dialogue systems capable of engaging in multi-turn, goal-oriented conversations remains a significant challenge, especially in specialized domains with limited data.
By Lior Baruch, Moshe Butman, Kfir Bar, Doron Friedman