arXiv AI
Ask or Answer: A Decision Framework for Multi-Turn Health Misinformation Intervention
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24
PCQC: Privileged Counterfactual Question Credit for Multi-Turn Medical Dialogue
arXiv:2609.27987v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have made substantial progress on medical question-answering, yet effective medical dialogue also requires learning to ask...
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27
Large Language Model Few-Shot Prompting with Dilemma Training Outperforms Human Surrogates in Predicting Patient Preferences
The paper introduces P4-DT, a personalized patient preference predictor that uses dilemma training to elicit context‑dependent decision reasoning. In a study of 12 patient‑surrogate pairs, P4‑DT achieved 81.7% accuracy in predicting patient treatment choices, outperforming unassisted surrogates (55.0%) and surrogates aided by a simpler P4 model (61.7%). The authors show that incorporating contextual scenarios and open‑ended text into prompts improves accuracy by 15 percentage points over static value ratings.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22
Fathom-Vaidya: Advancing Medical Reasoning with Rubric-Based Rewards
arXiv:2609.24480v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) in healthcare requires robust performance across two complementary dimensions - diagnostic reasoning: the conv...
arXiv AI
Aug 11
When Confidence Fails: Overconfidence in LLMs under Uncertainty and Missing Clinical Information
arXiv:2608. 09080v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance in medical question answering and clinical reasoning tasks.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1
MedConceal: A Benchmark for Clinical Hidden-Concern Reasoning Under Partial Observability
MedConceal is a new benchmark for evaluating medical dialogue systems on hidden‑concern reasoning under partial observability. It features 300 curated cases and 600 clinician‑LLM interactions, using an interactive patient simulator that hides latent concerns and tracks their revelation and resolution through theory‑grounded communication signals. The benchmark assesses both confirmation (surfacing hidden concerns) and intervention (addressing the primary concern), revealing that current models excel on different metrics while human clinicians still outperform them on intervention success.
arXiv AI
Jun 4
MedRedFlag: Investigating how LLMs Redirect Misconceptions in Real-World Health Communication
arXiv:2601. 09853v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Real-world health questions from patients often unintentionally embed false assumptions or premises.