arXiv:2607. 06435v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Data from Singapore indicated that about 31% of the population had evidence of Helicobacter pylori infection.
arXiv:2608.28974v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Clinically relevant oncology information is distributed across heterogeneous, longitudinal documentation, creating substantial abstraction burden and r...
The paper introduces VERGE, a verification-enhanced refinement workflow that extracts six red‑flag symptoms and family‑history risk status for early‑onset colorectal cancer from free‑text clinical notes. VERGE uses retrieval‑augmented generation followed by a bounded verification‑refinement cycle that checks textual grounding and clinical validity, correcting claims until resolved or escalating to human review. In evaluation on 4,033 clinician‑labeled note‑finding pairs, VERGE improved precision from 0.764 to 0.849 and MCC from 0.681 to 0.730 compared to a single‑agent baseline, while requiring human review for only 1.5 % of claims.
arXiv:2607. 12886v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Clinical notes contain many of the signs and symptoms that bring patients to care, yet this information rarely reaches structured fields.
The paper introduces ClinGeX, a large‑language‑model agent that uses 105 curated executable skills to automate clinical genomic analysis. In benchmark tests, ClinGeX achieved 71.7% macro‑averaged task‑level concordance, outperforming the best comparator at 45.7%. Human‑AI collaboration studies showed ClinGeX significantly improved case‑level concordance across variant analysis, rare disease interpretation, and oncology decision‑making, while also reducing interpretation time.
arXiv:2603. 01131v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Clinical diagnosis is a gradual process of evidence integration, in which physicians move from symptoms and medical history to examinations, competing hypotheses, disease relations, and treatment decisions.
LUCAID is an agentic multimodal AI system designed for precision lung cancer pathology, integrating nine modules that cover the entire routine workflow—from quality control and tumor detection to histological subtyping, microenvironment profiling, cellularity quantification, and biomarker scoring (PD‑L1, MET, TROP‑2). The system generates automated structured reports and allows interactive querying of module outputs. In prospective clinical validation, LUCAID achieved 93.0% concordance with an expert‑panel reference standard for clinically actionable decisions, outperforming five experienced thoracic pathologists who ranged from 68.3% to 81.1% concordance.
Lung cancer tissue diagnostics is complex, as therapy decisions in precision oncology rely on the integration of histomorphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features. Yet pathological asses...
Background: Disease severity is a multidimensional construct difficult to capture with rule-based approaches in Electronic Healthcare Records (EHR). Agentic large language model (LLM) systems could synthesise clinical evidence and reason over EHRs, but remain unevaluated for this task.
ReviewPilot is a conversational multi‑agent system designed to automate the PRISMA workflow for systematic literature reviews, covering both paper screening and evidence extraction. Researchers can customize screening criteria and extraction schemas through dialogue, with a project memory preserving configurations and revisions. The system records the rationale for each screening decision and the source of every extracted value, and it has demonstrated superior performance to single‑prompt LLMs and AgentSLR in epidemiology, achieving screening macro F1 scores up to 0.776 and extraction F1 up to 0.788, while also showing close agreement with human annotators in biomedicine and human‑computer interaction case studies.
arXiv:2610.16175v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Real-world studies (RWS) analyze routinely collected healthcare data, such as electronic health records and insurance claims, to estimate treatment eff...
arXiv:2606. 11830v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Background.
The paper introduces a retrieval‑augmented multi‑agent framework that automatically generates instance‑specific evaluation rubrics for medical language models. By retrieving authoritative medical evidence, decomposing it into atomic facts, and combining these with user interaction constraints, the system produces fine‑grained criteria that outperform GPT‑4o on HealthBench and LLMEval‑Med. The generated rubrics also guide response refinement, improving medical LLM output quality by 9.2%.