arXiv AI

Mind the Style: Impact of Communication Style on Human-Chatbot Interaction

arXiv Computation and Language
6d ago

Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots for Motivational Interviewing: A Scoping Review From System Design to Intervention Outcomes

This scoping review examined 48 studies on generative AI chatbots designed to deliver motivational interviewing (MI). It found that most systems were text‑based and disembodied, with about half incorporating dynamic adaptation, and that safety reporting was inconsistent. While user perceptions were generally positive and many studies reported MI‑consistent interactions, evidence for sustained behavioral or functional change remains limited.

By Runze Hu, Jingqi Kong, Yang Yang, Yihang Yang, Jingyao Liu, Haizhou Tang, Shanghang Zhang, Zheng Liu
arXiv AI
Sep 7

How a Chatbot's Response Style Shapes a Classroom: A Multi-Agent Simulation of Students Consulting AI

The study simulates a virtual classroom of 20 student agents who consult either a friend or a counselor AI when stressed. Five state variables (stress, happiness, self‑reliance, AI dependence, sociability) are tracked over daily phases, and the counselor AI is tested with six response styles (affirming, listening, solution‑oriented, reality‑redirecting, inciting, blaming). Results show that a solution‑oriented style lowers AI dependence and boosts self‑reliance, while affirming and inciting styles increase AI dependence, with inciting also raising stress and absenteeism; the listening style does not alleviate stress.

By Rin Tamai, Yuya Dan
arXiv AI
Jul 24

HARP: The Human--AI Research Platform

arXiv:2607. 20773v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shifted human--computer interaction from `traditional'' interface journeys toward more conversational exchanges.

By Zeshu Zhu, Natalie Friedman, Kevin Weatherwax, Emily Eiben
arXiv AI
Jun 15

Communication Policy Evolution for Proactive LLM Agents

arXiv:2606. 14314v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents have rapidly evolved into autonomous systems, yet a persistent information gap remains between users and agents: communication is costly, while users' identical preferences further limit information exchange.

By Xinbei Ma, Jiyang Qiu, Yao Yao, Zheng Wu, Yijie Lu, Xiangmou Qu, Jiaxin Yin, Xingyu Lou, Jun Wang, Weiwen Liu, Weinan Zhang, Zhuosheng Zhang, Hai Zhao
arXiv AI
6d ago

Do Personality-Tuned LLMs Make Better Social Agents?

The paper examines whether fine‑tuning large language models (LLMs) with personality‑labelled data improves their ability to act as socially interactive agents. Two small open‑weight LLMs were fine‑tuned on a corpus of personality‑labelled social media posts and dialogues, and the resulting models were evaluated in various social interaction scenarios by independent LLM judges. The findings show that the fine‑tuned models do not outperform their baseline counterparts in role‑playing personalities, though they offer comparable text quality and increased linguistic diversity for the Qwen models; low inter‑rater agreement limits confidence in the results, suggesting future work should focus on training data quality and domain alignment.

By Tim Krabbe, Xiaodan Shi