Pretrained models for cell and nuclear instance segmentation differ substantially in architecture, pretraining data and objectives, parameter count, inference strategy, adaptation requirements, postpr...
arXiv:2608.29677v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Despite rapid advances in MIS, fair and reproducible comparisons of segmentation models remain challenging due to heterogeneous datasets, inconsisten...
By Vanessa Borst, Lukas Horn, Daniel Grillmeyer, Thomas Prantl, Samuel Kounev
arXiv:2607. 09084v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid expansion of large-scale AI models has led to significant performance breakthroughs across diverse domains, yet it has also raised critical concerns regarding computational costs, energy consumption, and environmental sustainability.
By Linhui Xiao, Guiping Cao, Mingyue Guo, Xianchao Guan, Fan Yang, Ming Tao, Xin Li, Yuxin Peng, Yaowei Wang
The paper studies Graph-Guided Token Merging (G2TM), a module that reduces token count in Vision Transformers. It evaluates G2TM across multiple segmentation frameworks and decoder types, finding that its performance gains are tied to the encoder rather than the decoder. The authors report consistent reductions in GFLOPs (22‑47%) and throughput improvements (up to 74%) on ADE20K, with optimal hyperparameters depending mainly on backbone pre‑training and target dataset.
By Victor Bercy, Martyna Poreba, Michal Szczepanski, Samia Bouchafa
arXiv:2608. 08961v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI training's rising resource intensity is straining electricity supplies and carbon budgets, motivating systematic study of memory-efficient training on constrained hardware.
By Sarthak Mahapatra, Zihan Zhou, Khatoon Khedri, Mehdi Hosseinzadeh, Reza Rawassizadeh
arXiv:2609.09863v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Choosing a deep learning architecture for label-free single-cell classification remains an open question, with microscopy benchmarks reporting conflict...
By Philip Graemer, Giuseppe Di Caprio
The computational complexity of Transformers scales quadratically with the number of tokens, which significantly constrains the efficiency of vision models, particularly recent ViT-based foundation models in dense prediction tasks. Instance segmentation, a typical dense visual prediction task in the remote sensing field, faces similar challenges.
arXiv:2512. 14937v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Gliomas are the most common malignant brain tumors in adults and are among the most lethal.
By Abhijeet Parida, Daniel Capell\'an-Mart\'in, Zhifan Jiang, Nishad Kulkarni, Krithika Iyer, Austin Tapp, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Mar\'ia J. Ledesma-Carbayo, Marius George Linguraru
arXiv:2606. 17702v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Characterising the tumour microenvironment (TME) from routine H&E-stained histology images requires simultaneous cell segmentation, feature extraction, and interpretable clinical reporting.
By Wan Siti Halimatul Munirah Wan Ahmad, Faris Syahmi Samidi, Mohammad Badal Ahmmed, Vimal Angela Thiviyanathan, Selvam James Thavaraj, Anwar P. P. Abdul Majeed
arXiv:2609.36429v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Predicting gene expression from H&E-stained histology images offers a scalable alternative to costly spatial transcriptomics, yet most existing methods...
By Zijun Gao, Chunbin Gu, Jinxi Xiang, Xiangde Luo, Pheng-Ann Heng
The paper introduces CP‑BG‑Bench, a paired‑view evaluation framework for Cell Painting vision encoders that fixes a central cell across four matched views (raw crop, segmented, and density‑augmented variants). Using this framework on three datasets and three encoders, the authors show that standard single‑metric rankings (e.g., replicate mAP) vary systematically across protocols, revealing disagreements along axes of cell versus background, morphology versus context, and within‑study versus across‑batch performance. The study demonstrates that segmented views can outperform crops in certain tasks and that background‑driven gains are largely determined by experimental design rather than encoder choice.
By Tim Treis, Nikita Moshkov, Johan Fredin Haslum, Shantanu Singh, Fabian J. Theis
arXiv:2607. 18504v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Benchmarks for Geospatial Foundation Models (GFMs) increasingly rank models by aggregate score, but such rankings obscure why models differ: how much of the gap is architecture, how much is decoder capacity, and how much is a use-case-specific artefact?
By Frederick Schindlegger, Kenzo Bounegta, Eva Gmelich Meijling, Johannes Jakubik, Arnt-B{\o}rre Salberg, Theodor Forgaard, Nicolas Longepe, Valerio Marsocci