arXiv:2610.19074v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reliable uncertainty quantification remains an important challenge in AI. Hierarchical Bayesian methods provide a principled framework for this by repr...
By Neil K. Chada, Simon Cotter, Kody J. H. Law, Xinzhu Liang
arXiv:2608.29349v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Gaussian process (GP) regression with a single global GP (GP-glo) incurs cubic computational cost, limiting scalability to large datasets. Product-of-e...
By Yean Hoon Ong, Paolo Barucca, Wei Pan, Jun Wang
The paper extends Neural Posterior Estimation (NPE) to handle simulators whose parameter spaces contain both discrete and continuous dimensions. It introduces an inference network that factorizes the joint posterior into discrete and continuous components, using an autoregressive classifier for the discrete part and a generative model for the continuous part, trained jointly with a single simulation-based objective. A diagnostic tool for assessing calibration of the mixed posterior is also proposed, and the method is shown to produce accurate, calibrated posteriors on toy and real scientific simulators.
By Jan Boelts, Cornelius Schr\"oder, Jonas Beck, Jakob H. Macke, Michael Deistler, Daniel Gedon
arXiv:2607. 06252v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many problems in science and engineering are difficult to model accurately, either due to unknown physical mechanisms, poorly quantified measurement uncertainty, or prohibitive computational costs of high-fidelity simulations.
By Fabian Schneider, Tapio Helin, Leila Taghizadeh
arXiv:2504. 01894v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present a bifidelity method for uncertainty quantification of parameter estimates in complex systems, leveraging generative models trained to sample the target conditional distribution.
By Caroline Tatsuoka, Minglei Yang, Dongbin Xiu, Guannan Zhang
arXiv:2601. 07944v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Since the turn of the century, approximate Bayesian inference has steadily evolved as new computational techniques have been incorporated to handle increasingly complex, large-scale predictive problems.
By Roy Shivam Ram Shreshtth, Arnab Hazra, Gourab Mukherjee
arXiv:2606. 25188v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Efficient uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential for trustworthy large-scale learning.
By Kun Jin, James Harrison, Jiawei Li, Sihan Liu, Jiayi Liu, Randolph Linderman, Yuening Li, Arnab Bhadury, Sourabh Prakash Bansod, Liang Liu, Jasper Snoek
arXiv:2606. 19643v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Motivated by the privacy, sensitivity and sharing limitations of health data, we present a comprehensive pipeline for inference of Bayesian mixture models within a federated learning setting, i.
By Julie Fendler, Francesca L. Crowe, Tom Marshall, Sylvia Richardson, Paul D. W. Kirk
The paper introduces a two-way guidance framework that jointly learns summary statistics and posterior distributions for Bayesian simulation-based inference. By imposing a structural restriction on the learned summary, the method ensures that the posterior remains sufficient, while the posterior objective simultaneously steers the summary toward sufficiency. The authors provide theoretical guarantees on posterior estimation error and the deviation of the learned summary from sufficiency, outlining conditions on simulation budgets needed to recover increasingly concentrated posteriors as observation size grows.
By Percy S. Zhai, Max Pachman, Peverel D. Shipley, Jungeum Kim
arXiv:2609.39525v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Casting Bayesian inference as a neural network optimization problem targeting an amortized posterior is attractive, as it extends to otherwise intracta...
By Hans Olischl\"ager, Svenja Jedhoff, \v{S}imon Kucharsk\'y, Aayush Mishra, Stefan T. Radev, Paul B\"urkner
arXiv:2606. 27269v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reliably quantifying predictive uncertainty is difficult for complex, high-dimensional, or misspecified models.
By Graham Gibson, John Tipton, Kellin Rumsey, Natalie Klein
Conditional Mean Flows introduce a new approach for simulation-based inference that replaces the costly numerical integration of traditional flow matching with few-step sampling and tractable density evaluation. By identifying conditional flow maps through a mean flow objective and using independent masking, the method allows direct estimation of marginal likelihoods. Experiments demonstrate that single-step conditional mean flow density evaluation achieves error comparable to 200-step flow matching while accelerating downstream MCMC sampling by roughly 200‑fold.
By Jonas Arruda, Jan Hasenauer, Stefan T. Radev