arXiv AI

Real-Time Deadlines Reveal Fragile Temporal Adaptation in LLM Strategic Dialogues

arXiv AI
Oct 2

ReLiveGym: Evaluating Long-Lived Agents over Weeks of Replayed Reality

ReLiveGym is a diagnostic environment that evaluates long‑lived language‑model agents over weeks of chronologically replayed real‑world streams such as news, market data, and social media. The tasks vary in time sensitivity, reasoning depth, and recurrence, and the study tests eight base language models to see how model choice and harness design—especially action timing—affect performance. Continuous learning from hindsight feedback is also examined to address failure modes in these long‑term tasks.

By Xisen Jin, Jingheng Li, Zhenglun Chen, Junyi Du, Xiang Ren
arXiv AI
5d ago

On the Clock: Towards Punctual and Productive Time-Budgeted AI Agents

The paper investigates whether small large language model agents can operate within explicit wall‑clock time budgets while using the allotted time productively. Experiments with Qwen3.6‑27B on MLE‑Bench Lite and Qwen3‑4B on Zork I show that agents fail to translate budget statements into controlled time use, largely due to lack of timing feedback and poor anticipation of action durations. Interventions such as harness‑based timing exposure, enforcement hooks, and reinforcement learning with budget‑aware rewards improve budget adherence but do not lead to better task performance, revealing a persistent gap between respecting time limits and effectively allocating extra time.

By Aaron Wang, Neelabh Madan, Vlad Sobal, Matthew Trager, Michael Kleinman, Elman Mansimov, Wei Xia, Stefano Soatto
arXiv AI
Jun 15

Chronological Thinking in Full-Duplex Spoken Dialogue Language Models

arXiv:2510. 05150v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in spoken dialogue language models (SDLMs) reflect growing interest in shifting from turn-based to full-duplex systems, where the models continuously perceive user speech streams while generating responses.

By Donghang Wu, Haoyang Zhang, Chen Chen, Tianyu Zhang, Fei Tian, Xuerui Yang, Gang Yu, Hexin Liu, Nana Hou, Yuchen Hu, Eng Siong Chng
arXiv AI
Sep 25

Delay-of-Gratification as a Multi-Agent Survival Micro-benchmark for Long-Horizon LLMs: Social Exposure, Personas, and Tool Use Budgets

The paper introduces a new multi‑agent micro‑benchmark called Delay‑of‑Gratification, modeled after the Stanford marshmallow experiment, to evaluate large language models (LLMs) in long‑horizon, multi‑turn interactions. In the benchmark, ReAct agents use a per‑step “raise a question” tool under various constraints—social context (broadcast vs. isolated), persona traits (age, hedonic drive), and tool‑use policy (mandatory vs. optional). Across 19,200 trajectories, the study finds that most agents exhibit an early impulse to “eat,” only 75.9% persist to the end, and factors such as isolation and hedonic drive significantly influence survival and questioning behavior, with ablations showing that removing hedonic drive and age can improve completion rates.

By Olga Manakina, Igor Bogdanov, Chung-Horng Lung
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Speak for Me: Giving LLMs the Situational Awareness to Participate in a Meeting

The paper introduces CAPA, a Collaborative Agent Predictive Architecture designed to give large language model (LLM) agents situational awareness in online meetings. CAPA uses a Perceiver to update meeting state, a Predictor to forecast conversation flow, a Controller to decide speaking actions, and a Generator to phrase contributions. Evaluated on 137 AMI meetings, CAPA reduces the silence rate from 51.4% to 2.5%, doubles credited recovery, and maintains low hallucination, demonstrating that structured state tracking is key to effective delegation.

By Muneeb Khan, Frederic Kirstein, Terry Ruas, Bela Gipp