COMET is a coordinated multi-layer runtime monitoring framework designed for human-supervised AI-enabled safety systems. It employs three monitoring layers—signal integrity, physics consistency, and the AI system’s competence envelope—whose outputs are combined and displayed via a traffic-light interface. Evaluated on a compressed‑air leak dataset, COMET eliminates the AI’s silent failures under covariate shift and most sensor faults, while maintaining a low false‑alarm rate.
By Niclas Flehmig, Mary Ann Lundteigen, Shen Yin
arXiv:2608. 06657v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern cyber-physical and AI-assisted systems couple human operators, AI decision modules, and automated controllers in a single control loop, so trustworthiness depends on the whole loop, not any one model.
By Joshua Zuniga, Srinivasan Subramanian, Ramya Madhuri Narapureddy, Md Abdullah Al Hafiz Khan
arXiv:2604. 02478v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep learning models excel at detecting anomaly patterns in normal data.
By Jiyong Kwon, Ujin Jeon, Sooji Lee, Guang Lin
arXiv:2608. 14680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliability in LLM-based agentic systems is a property of the whole execution (its tool calls, model calls, guardrails, and inter-agent messages), not of the final answer alone, yet evaluating only task outcomes reveals little about how or why a run fails.
By Chenkai Zhang, Yiran Li, Yifang Tian, Michalis Bachras, Hans-Arno Jacobsen
arXiv:2608. 02786v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI systems can fail silently.
By Priyanka Bajaj (Independent Researcher)
The paper introduces SPAR, a closed‑loop simulation platform that couples real‑time AUV control software with a higher‑level orchestration layer to evaluate large language models (LLMs) for fault diagnosis and recovery. It demonstrates that a frontier LLM outperforms locally deployable models in identifying a mass‑shift fault, and shows that successful diagnosis depends on following a complete diagnostic procedure rather than premature conclusions. The study provides an architecture and ensemble evaluation methodology for LLM‑assisted mission management on low‑power autonomous underwater vehicles.
The paper introduces CARE, a calibrated adaptive rectification and escalation framework that integrates AI models with human reviewers to ensure safe, human-aligned decisions. CARE continuously learns from human feedback, improving automation while reducing the need for human queries. Experiments on driving, language, and robotics datasets show a 25–81% reduction in human queries compared to baseline methods.
By Chenyu Zhang, Rachel Luo, Boyi Li, Anjali Parashar, Marco Pavone, Apoorva Sharma
arXiv:2606. 00090v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physical AI systems increasingly map multimodal observations, language instructions, and learned world representations into physically consequential actions.
By Barak Or
The paper introduces SPAR, a closed‑loop simulation platform that couples real‑time AUV control software with a higher‑level orchestration layer for fault injection, prompting, and evaluation of large language models (LLMs) in diagnosing and recovering from anomalies. SPAR enables ensemble testing of LLMs, comparing a frontier model with three locally deployable LLMs on a mass‑shift fault scenario across 480 trials, revealing that model choice significantly affects diagnostic accuracy. The study demonstrates that while the frontier model consistently ranks the correct fault mechanism among its top hypotheses, local models succeed mainly when they follow the full diagnostic procedure, and overall diagnosis and operational decisions appear decoupled in this dataset.
By Khalid Halba, Kylie Cooper, James G. Bellingham
The paper "Reliability Engineering for AI Systems: Challenges, Methods, and Directions" discusses how AI reliability extends beyond correct outputs to include consistent operation of retrieval, memory, tool use, permissions, human oversight, and inter-system interactions, especially for generative AI. It adapts traditional reliability engineering techniques—such as failure definitions, operational envelopes, FMEA, accelerated testing, field monitoring, and reliability growth—to AI, proposing a four-level diagnostic framework and a TEVV (Test, Evaluation, Verification, Validation) approach. The authors also introduce the SMART framework for statistical guidance and reference NIST’s AI risk management framework, illustrating their concepts with three case studies and emphasizing the urgent need for new measurements and safety guardrails as AI systems evolve rapidly.
By Rong Pan, Yili Hong, Min Xie
arXiv:2609.06835v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Agentic AI systems execute complex tasks through long-horizon workflows of planning, tool use, and multi-agent coordination. Task failures in these s...
By Chaoyu Zhang, Hexuan Yu, Heng Jin, Shanghao Shi, Ning Zhang, Yi Shi, Yulia R. Gel, Y. Thomas Hou, Wenjing Lou
arXiv:2607. 19321v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI agents begin to automate AI R&D, we need ways to assess whether their outputs are safe to deploy, even when the agents themselves may be untrusted.
By Lena Libon, Ben Rank, Jehyeok Yeon, David Schmotz, Jeremy Qin, Daniel Donnelly, Derck Prinzhorn, Maksym Andriushchenko