Subliminal Learning is Non-Semantic Distillation
arXiv:2608. 05734v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Subliminal Learning (SL) is a surprising type of generalization displayed by modern language models.
arXiv:2606. 00831v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Subliminal learning is a phenomenon where language models can transmit behavioral traits to other models through seemingly innocuous data (Cloud et al.
arXiv:2608. 05734v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Subliminal Learning (SL) is a surprising type of generalization displayed by modern language models.
arXiv:2606. 00995v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Subliminal learning refers to a student language model acquiring a teacher's traits (e.
arXiv:2606. 11270v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Distillation of a language model intended to transfer benign behavior to a student model may also transfer undesirable characteristics, if they are present in the teacher model, a phenomenon known as subliminal learning.
Subliminal Learning (SL) is a surprising type of generalization displayed by modern language models. It allows the transfer of a bias or behavior from a teacher model to a student by distilling from seemingly unrelated or random synthetic data from the teacher.
arXiv:2605. 07284v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A late-layer change learned during post-training may work on the base model's earlier state, or it may depend on earlier computation learned with it.
arXiv:2602. 06941v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models can recover mid-generation from task-misaligned activation steering, producing explicit verbal restarts (e.
arXiv:2607. 13162v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: What a language model will and will not do is largely set during post-training, but which behaviors it expresses, hides, or resists is not revealed by prompting alone.
arXiv:2608. 14681v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Words recur constantly in natural language use, yet it remains unclear whether language models reactivate prior representations or re-evaluate repeated words afresh, and whether post-training changes this default behavior.
The asymmetry between language production and perception has been well-documented in psycholinguistics. Whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit a functionally analogous distinction remains an open question, particularly given that LLMs rely on the same underlying mechanism (next-token prediction) for both input and output processing.
arXiv:2607. 25907v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Activation steering controls model behavior by editing internal activations at inference time.
arXiv:2607. 04510v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Emergent misalignment (EM) -- the broad misbehaviour a language model acquires after fine-tuning on narrow harmful data -- is mediated in Qwen2.
arXiv:2608. 17564v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Unified multimodal models (UMMs) are motivated by the hope that understanding and generation reinforce each other but controlled ablations repeatedly find that adding a generation objective leaves understanding flat.