Tokenized Key-Gated Adapter Routing (Locket) is a framework that embeds fine‑grained, policy‑driven access control into large language models by training lightweight LoRA adapters for different privacy policies. A gating module associates a learned keyed entry token with a specific adapter, allowing authorized tokens to unlock private knowledge while invalid or missing tokens trigger privacy‑preserving adapters that redact or sanitize sensitive content. Experiments on datasets such as Enron, ECHR, and Yelp with models like Qwen3, Llama‑3.2, and Gemma‑2‑2B show that Locket maintains perplexity comparable to fine‑tuning when the correct token is provided, and significantly reduces PII leakage when the token is absent or invalid, without sacrificing utility.
By Mohamed Shaaban, Mohamed Elmahallawy
InferPriv is a new benchmark that evaluates inferential privacy leakage in large language model (LLM) assistants. It measures whether an honest-but-curious recipient can deduce a user’s sensitive attributes from an LLM’s reply during routine tasks, a type of leakage not captured by existing direct‑leakage benchmarks. Testing five frontier models, the study finds that inferential leakage rates (16.2–25.2%) far exceed direct leakage, even when direct leakage is near zero under privacy‑aware prompts.
By Pengrun Huang, Yiwei Fu, Luoxi Meng, Kamalika Chaudhuri
arXiv:2610.27213v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Personalized large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on profile-conditioned inference, pairing public requests with rich, user-specific facts....
By Mingchen Li, Zifan Peng, Kewei Sha, Lavinia F Pieptea, Heng Fan, Junhua Ding, Meikang Qiu, Yunhe Feng
arXiv:2609.14003v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Personal AI agents built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly given access to a user's private data and communications in order to provid...
By Minsun Shim, Ramisha Raida Karim, Ruthwik Jakkula, Kaiwen Zhou, Xin Liu, Xin Eric Wang, Zhou Li
arXiv:2609.35937v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: While prior work has documented privacy failures in LLM agents, it remains unclear how the presentation of privacy guidance influences their choice o...
By Lucas Biechy, C\'edric Eichler, H\'eber H. Arcolezi, Nicolas Anciaux
Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems can expose protected state through internal messages, tool arguments, logs, and persistent memory even when their public outputs appear innocuous. Existing privacy prompts, redaction methods, and source-level access controls restrict surface content or data access, but do not specify what a legitimately informed agent should disclose or how that disclosure may be reused downstream.
The paper introduces a clinically grounded privacy evaluation framework for medical language models, assessing leakage across a spectrum of adversarial access levels—from publicly inferable demographics to leaked note fragments. Using this framework on an LM pretrained on 378,000 clinical notes, the authors find that routine encounter metadata leads to high verbatim memorization and significant recovery of sensitive diagnoses (e.g., AUROC 0.91 for abortion, 0.82 for HIV). They also note that exact-match memorization can overstate disclosure, with 36% of memorized tokens being templated documentation, underscoring the risks of training on longitudinal clinical data and offering a reusable evaluation tool.
By Sasha Ronaghi, Sana Tonekaboni, Lena Stempfle, Vivian Utti, Jordan Li Cahoon, Nathaniel Hendrix, Ayin Vala, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Emily Alsentzer
The paper investigates how large language model agents can inadvertently leak confidential information by combining data from multiple documents—a phenomenon termed the "mosaic effect." Using 30 synthetic cybersecurity, medical, and military scenarios, the authors generate 10,800 simulated and 1,440 live answers from three LLM agents, finding that even the best model discloses forbidden composites in over 7% of simulated responses. While visible classification headers and aggregation rules reduce disclosure rates, unsafe disclosures remain in roughly one third of simulated answers, and increased refusals do not fully prevent leakage of prohibited conclusions.
By Daniel Ruiz, Luca Luceri, Emilio Ferrara
The paper compares data-level and training-level methods for balancing language model capability and privacy leakage on synthetic medical records with embedded canaries. Direct finetuning achieves the highest capability but leaks the most private information, while DP‑SGD reduces leakage at a significant cost to performance. Generating privacy‑aware synthetic data—especially with uniqueness‑aware rewriting—offers a better trade‑off, and more capable rewriting models tend to lower downstream privacy risks, though gains are inconsistent with increased compute.
By Zihao Zhao, Avi Schwarzschild, Casey Meehan, Katherine Lee, Zhili Feng, Dylan Sam
arXiv:2608. 02774v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI verification crosses a trust boundary: a verifier must learn enough to establish an authorized claim, yet the same evidence can reveal sensitive details about the model, workload, or hardware.
By Sleem Abdelghafar, Gabriel Kulp
arXiv:2610.23668v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Typed decision models often return more than a selected category. They also expose probabilities for each candidate and, sometimes, a separate confid...
By Yiqu Yang, Qiaoyuan Zheng, Yang Tian, Yu Fan, Elliott Ash
Large Language Models (LLMs) raise growing concerns about privacy leakage and copyright compliance. Membership inference is a key tool for assessing such risks, but existing studies mainly focus on whether specific samples or sample-based data units are used for training.