arXiv AI

The Announcement Carries the Cue: Markup, Boundaries, and the Notation of Pre-Training Corpora

arXiv:2608. 09093v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: How a document's arrangement is written down, its notation, is a training variable that no dataset card records.

arXiv Machine Learning
3d ago

Forecasting Corpus-Sampling Disagreement in Masked Text Reconstruction

The paper investigates how much a masked‑text reconstruction predictor’s outputs would differ if a second corpus were collected from the same population. Using a smoothed predictor based on token‑pair counts, the authors derive a first‑order formula for expected disagreement between predictors trained on two independent corpora, accounting for document length, random context counts, and token‑offset correlations. Experiments on TinyStories, WikiText‑103, and CNN/DailyMail show that increasing corpus size from 512 to 2,048 chunks of 64 tokens reduces disagreement only modestly (5–40 %), and that forecast accuracy improves with larger reference corpora and a source‑split jackknife correction. whyItMatters:"The study provides a practical method to estimate how much predictor outputs would change with additional data, informing decisions about data collection and model robustness in masked‑text reconstruction tasks."

By Hare Krishna
arXiv AI
Aug 24

Structure for Reading, Prose for Writing: Asymmetric Structural Conditioning in Multi-Agent Document Authoring

The paper reports on a deployed multi‑agent tender‑response system that uses an open‑weights language model under sovereignty constraints. In a blind comparison, the system’s answers were judged at least as good as human‑written bids in 40 of 55 sections, with only a few gaps attributable to missing knowledge rather than writing quality. The study also demonstrates an asymmetry in conditioning: while structural markup improves reading tasks, converting instruction material from prose to nested XML degrades answer quality, and naming forbidden constructions concentrates defects.

By Cheng Yu, Nikhil Mathew, Zhengjie Wang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Detectable Only Where It Is Confounded: What Verified Duplication Counts Say About Membership Evidence in Language Models

The paper investigates whether language models can identify sentences from their training data by using exact duplication counts from publicly released corpora for two model families, OLMo‑2 and Pythia. It finds that for typical duplication levels, models show only a weak trace of exposure, with a rank correlation near –0.08, and that strong signals only appear when a sentence appears roughly a thousand times, at which point fame rather than memory dominates. The study also demonstrates that common membership tests can be misleading, as changing a single word does not alter the model’s preference, and that controlling for register can significantly improve detector performance.

By Arman Nik Khah
arXiv AI
Oct 7

Isotropic Yet Undecodable: The Sequential Content-Sufficiency Gap in Latent-Predictive Text Representations

The paper investigates whether latent representations of text preserve the ordered information present in the input. Using an information‑theoretic decomposition, the authors show that even perfectly isotropic Gaussian representations can contain no target information, and that rank alone does not predict prediction risk. They introduce CANOPE, a non‑autoregressive framework with ordered latent canvases and geometric regularization, and demonstrate that while latent‑agreement and token‑grounded models achieve similar ranks, only the token‑grounded variant yields high positional recall and low word error rates on corrupted data.

By K. P. Santoso, N. Z. Fadil, F. P. Harsanti, R. V. H. Ginardi, G. N. Iyer