arXiv AI
Aug 12
Most biomedical publications show signs of LLM-assisted writing
arXiv:2608. 10715v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Over the past several years, LLM-powered chatbots and agents have become widely used as a tool for academic writing.
LLM assisted writing deserves empirical evaluation
Related stories
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 10
LLM-Generated or Human-Written? Comparing Review and Non-Review Papers on ArXiv
arXiv:2601.17036v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: ArXiv recently prohibited the upload of unpublished review papers to its servers in the Computer Science domain, citing a high prevalence of...
arXiv AI
Jun 9
Illusions of the Gold Standard: A Large-scale Analysis of Human Evaluation Protocols for Long-form Text Generation
arXiv:2606. 07936v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human evaluation plays a critical role in assessing the quality of generated text.
arXiv AI
Aug 5
AI-Assisted Peer Review Across Research Communities: From Reviewer AI Policies to LLM Review Quality
arXiv:2608. 03581v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI-assisted peer review is increasingly discussed and adopted as a tool to support the scientific publishing process, yet there is little systematic understanding of how publication venues regulate its use or of how capable current AI review systems are.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 4
AI-Assisted Peer Review Across Research Communities: From Reviewer AI Policies to LLM Review Quality
AI-assisted peer review is increasingly discussed and adopted as a tool to support the scientific publishing process, yet there is little systematic understanding of how publication venues regulate its use or of how capable current AI review systems are. We address these questions by first surveying reviewer-facing AI policies across 111 leading AI/NLP conferences and medical journals, revealing substantial regulation differences between the two communities.
arXiv AI
Sep 1
Paper Pilot: A Human-in-the-Loop Expert System for Evidence-Traceable Scientific Manuscript Generation in Applied Sciences
arXiv:2608.28596v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly embedded in scientific workflows for literature analysis, drafting, and review. Existing systems adv...
arXiv AI
Jun 9
Deterministic Integrity Gates for LLM-Assisted Clinical Manuscript Preparation: An Auditable Biomedical Informatics Architecture
arXiv:2606. 09500v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Objective.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1
Towards AI-Assisted Research Writing: Benchmarking LLMs for AI/ML Introduction Generation
arXiv:2508.14273v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As researchers increasingly adopt LLMs as writing assistants, generating high-quality research paper introductions remains both challenging and ess...
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 14
PRISMA-LLM: An Empirical Reporting Framework for AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews
The paper introduces PRISMA-LLM, a reporting framework for AI-assisted systematic reviews. It is based on an analysis of 888 review-automation papers, showing a shift toward LLM- and software-driven workflows and inconsistent reporting of evaluation and limitations. The framework separates implementation details from consequence-sensitive evaluation and limitation reporting.
arXiv AI
Sep 1
Do large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effects
arXiv:2608.28626v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate peer reviews, prompting examination of their capacity for critical evaluation. This st...
arXiv AI
Jun 2
Examine Clinicians' Modification of Hedging Language in Ambient AI Documentation: A Comparative Study of AI Drafts and Final Notes
arXiv:2606. 00018v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ambient AI documentation systems generate clinical note drafts that clinicians frequently revise before signing off into electronic health records, yet how these edits alter hedging language remains unclear.
arXiv AI
Jun 24
Policies Permitting LLM Use for Polishing Peer Reviews Are Currently Not Enforceable
arXiv:2603. 20450v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A number of scientific conferences and journals have recently enacted policies that prohibit LLM usage by peer reviewers, except for polishing, paraphrasing, and grammar correction of otherwise human-written reviews.