arXiv AI By Lena Holzwarth, Rita Gonz\'alez-M\'arquez, Dmitry Kobak

Most biomedical publications show signs of LLM-assisted writing

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 10715v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Over the past several years, LLM-powered chatbots and agents have become widely used as a tool for academic writing.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 24

Policies Permitting LLM Use for Polishing Peer Reviews Are Currently Not Enforceable

arXiv:2603. 20450v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A number of scientific conferences and journals have recently enacted policies that prohibit LLM usage by peer reviewers, except for polishing, paraphrasing, and grammar correction of otherwise human-written reviews.

By Rounak Saha, Gurusha Juneja, Dayita Chaudhuri, Naveeja Sajeevan, Nihar B Shah, Danish Pruthi
arXiv AI
Jul 24

Detecting LLM-Generated Tokens in Human--LLM Coauthored Text

arXiv:2607. 21458v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rise of human-AI collaborative writing has created a growing need for fine-grained detection methods that support localizing likely LLM-generated content in mixed-authorship documents.

By Yangjun Lu, Hongyi Zhou, Fabian Spill, Kai Ye, Chengchun Shi, Jin Zhu
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Understanding Stigmatizing Language in Clinical Documentation: A Paired Comparison of Ambient AI Drafts and Clinician Finalized Notes

arXiv:2606. 00019v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) documentation tools are increasingly deployed to reduce clinician documentation burden, but their implications for biased language in clinical notes remain unclear.

By Yiliang Zhou, Yawen Guo, Sairam Sutari, Jasmine Dhillon, Alexandra L. Beck, Emilie Chow, Steven Tam, Danielle Perret, Deepti Pandita, Gelareh Sadigh, Archana J. McEligot, Kai Zheng
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 23

Detecting LLM-Generated Tokens in Human--LLM Coauthored Text

The rise of human-AI collaborative writing has created a growing need for fine-grained detection methods that support localizing likely LLM-generated content in mixed-authorship documents. Existing methods for detecting LLM-generated text mainly focus on document-level classification and cannot identify which parts of the text are generated by LLMs.