arXiv AI

Examine Clinicians' Modification of Hedging Language in Ambient AI Documentation: A Comparative Study of AI Drafts and Final Notes

arXiv:2606. 00018v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ambient AI documentation systems generate clinical note drafts that clinicians frequently revise before signing off into electronic health records, yet how these edits alter hedging language remains unclear.

arXiv AI
Jun 2

Understanding Stigmatizing Language in Clinical Documentation: A Paired Comparison of Ambient AI Drafts and Clinician Finalized Notes

arXiv:2606. 00019v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) documentation tools are increasingly deployed to reduce clinician documentation burden, but their implications for biased language in clinical notes remain unclear.

By Yiliang Zhou, Yawen Guo, Sairam Sutari, Jasmine Dhillon, Alexandra L. Beck, Emilie Chow, Steven Tam, Danielle Perret, Deepti Pandita, Gelareh Sadigh, Archana J. McEligot, Kai Zheng
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 22

Knowledge Graph-Augmented Ambient AI for Clinical Note Generation

arXiv:2609.22239v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Ambient AI is increasingly adopted in healthcare to automatically generate clinical notes from patient-clinician conversations, with the potential to s...

By Jakir Hossain, Yi-Fei Zhao, Hongjian Wang, Minmei Shih, Katie Leigh Mullen, Ahmad P. Tafti, Leming Zhou, Manoj Purohit, William Hogan, Jay Zeng, Elizabeth Skidmore, Yanshan Wang
arXiv AI
Aug 6

Memorization in Large Language Models in Medicine: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Implications

arXiv:2509. 08604v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in medicine, with many studies adapting them through continued pre-training or fine-tuning on medical data to enhance domain-specific accuracy and safety.

By Anran Li, Lingfei Qian, Mengmeng Du, Yu Yin, Yan Hu, Zihao Sun, Yihang Fu, Hyunjae Kim, Erica Stutz, Xuguang Ai, Qianqian Xie, Rui Zhu, Jimin Huang, Yifan Yang, Siru Liu, Yih-Chung Tham, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Hyunghoon Cho, Zhiyong Lu, Hua Xu, Qingyu Chen
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

AI Writers Have a Consistent Stylometric Footprint, but AI Editors Do Not

The study demonstrates that text produced by large language models (LLMs) leaves a distinct stylometric footprint—primarily increased entropy and lexical diversity—across multiple models and domains. In contrast, AI editing of human text does not replicate this footprint; edited texts show only modest lexical diversity gains and reduced entropy, with lexical density emerging as the key distinguishing feature. Consequently, stylometric analysis can differentiate AI-generated from AI-edited content, but is less effective at distinguishing either from purely human writing.

By Zhengyang Shan, Yukyung Lee, Sophie Hao
arXiv AI
2d ago

Clinical Note Bloat Reduction for Efficient LLM Use

The paper introduces TRACE, a method that removes duplicated text—known as note bloat—from clinical notes by leveraging EHR metadata and frequency-based de‑duplication. Across 5.3 million notes from diverse patient cohorts, TRACE eliminated 47.3 % of chart text while preserving information extraction and prediction performance, with only 0.3–6.6 % of removed content being author‑generated. The authors project that applying TRACE could yield net savings of $1.00 M to $13.58 M over three years at a large academic center, depending on model pricing schemes.

By Jordan L. Cahoon, Chloe Stanwyck, Asad Aali, Rachel Madding, Sulaiman S. Somani, Emma Sun, Yixing Jiang, Renumathy Dhanasekaran, Emily Alsentzer
arXiv AI
Aug 28

Style as a Confound: False Positives in AI Detection of Non-Native Academic Writing

The study examines how professional English editing influences AI text detectors’ false-positive rates for non-native academic writing. Using 135,389 pairs of original and edited manuscripts, researchers found that detector responses varied widely—some editors increased AI scores while others decreased them—and that score changes correlated with the extent of editing. These results highlight professional editing style as a key confounding factor in AI detection, complicating the distinction between AI authorship and linguistic style.

By Hyeonchu Park, Gahye Jeong, Bugeun Kim
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 10

MedDeID enables locally governed clinical-text de-identification from real or synthetic training data

MedDeID is an on‑premises framework that combines in‑house annotation, synthetic‑note generation, model training, inference, pseudonymisation and evaluation to de‑identify clinical text. On a Dutch hospital benchmark, a hospital‑trained transformer detected 98.9 % of identifying text while redacting only 0.24 % of non‑identifier text; a synthetic‑only model achieved 96.1 %. In primary‑care notes, the synthetic‑trained model outperformed the hospital‑trained model in recall and robustness to identifier‑format changes, and an English version trained without real text reached 99.7 % and 98.9 % detection on synthetic benchmarks.

By Stig Hellemans, Tom Stroobants, Elyne Scheurwegs, Pieter Meysman, Philippe G. Jorens, Kris Laukens