arXiv Machine Learning

Fast Equivariant Imaging: Accelerating Unsupervised Learning and Model Adaptation via Inexact Splitting

arXiv:2507. 06764v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In this work, we propose Fast Equivariant Imaging (FEI), a novel unsupervised learning framework to rapidly and efficiently train deep imaging networks without ground-truth data.

arXiv AI
Jul 31

PatchDenoiser: Parameter-efficient multi-scale patch learning and fusion denoiser for Low-dose CT imaging

arXiv:2602. 21987v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Low-dose CT images are essential for reducing radiation exposure in cancer screening, pediatric imaging, and longitudinal monitoring protocols, but their quality is often degraded by noise from low-dose acquisition, patient motion, or scanner limitations, affecting both clinical interpretation and downstream analysis.

By Jitindra Fartiyal, Pedro Freire, Sergei K. Turitsyn, Sergei G. Solovski
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 26

Enabling self-supervised learned primal dual with Noise2Inverse

arXiv:2606. 26991v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: X-ray computed tomography reconstruction is an ill-posed inverse problem, particularly in low-dose and sparse-angle settings where measurements are noisy and incomplete.

By Antti S\"allinen, Siiri Rautio, Santeri Kaupinm\"aki, Andreas Hauptmann
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 25

Enabling self-supervised learned primal dual with Noise2Inverse

X-ray computed tomography reconstruction is an ill-posed inverse problem, particularly in low-dose and sparse-angle settings where measurements are noisy and incomplete. While learned reconstruction methods such as the Learned Primal-Dual algorithm achieve strong performance, they typically rely on supervised training with access to ground-truth data, which is often unavailable in practice.

arXiv AI
Aug 18

CG-GLORE: A Conjugate Gradient-Based Global-Local Regularization Network for Sparse-View CT Reconstruction

arXiv:2608. 15246v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse-view computed tomography (CT) reduces radiation dose by acquiring fewer projection views, but the resulting inverse problem is highly ill-posed and often produces severe streak artifacts.

By Tran Xuan Hieu Le, Doanh C. Bui, Vu Trung Duong Le, Hoai Luan Pham, Khang Nguyen, Mai K. Nguyen, Tu Bao Ho, Yasuhiko Nakashima
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 24

nnFoundation: 3D Foundation Models for Radiology

nnFoundation introduces complementary convolutional and transformer-based 3D foundation models for radiology, trained on 2.1 million CT, MRI, and PET volumes from 125 datasets. The models are evaluated on 108 tasks—including segmentation, detection, classification, report generation, and image retrieval—under domain shift, low-data, and low-compute scenarios, consistently outperforming prior 3D foundation models and training from scratch. Performance varies by task type, with convolutional models excelling at spatially localized tasks and transformer models at global semantic reasoning, and dynamic alignment with dataset characteristics further enhances transferability.

By Constantin Ulrich Harsy, Tassilo Wald, Karol Gotkowski, Yannick Kirchhoff, Marcel Knopp, Maximilian Rokuss, Elisa Stegmeier, Philipp Schader, Dasha Trofimova, Raphael Stock, Kim-Celine Kahl, Stephen Schaumann, Selen Erkan, David Zimmerer, Stefan Denner, Moritz Langenberg, Sebastian Ziegler, Katharina Eckstein, Maximilian Fischer, Jonathan Suprijadi, B\'alint Kov\'acs, Benjamin Hamm, Anand Deshpande, Dimitrios Bounias, Nico Disch, Shuhan Xiao, Jessica K\"achele, Jan Sellner, Rajesh Baidya, Jeremias Traub, Lars Kr\"amer, Maximilian Zenk, Tim R\"adsch, Stefan Dvoretskii, Robin Peretzke, Jonathan Deissler, Alexandra Ertl, Partha Ghosh, Kris Dreher, Stefan Dinkelacker, Annika Reinke, Evangelia Christodoulou, Numan Saeed, Yoland Savriama, Santiago Estrada, David K\"ugler, Laura Alexandra Daza Barragan, Cristina Isabel Gonzalez Osorio, Jan Peeken, Michael Baumgartner, Marvin Teichmann, Guillaume Chabin, Matthias Kirchler, Valentin Koch, for the ALFA study, Markus Hohenhaus, Dimitri Koslov, Nina Decker, Mohammad Yaqub, Arnd Heuser, Martin Reuter, Julia A. Schnabel, Tobias Heimann, Florin Ghesu, Paul Brachmann, Claus P. Heu{\ss}el, Alexander Radbruch, Gianluca Brugnara, Aditya Rastogi, Martha Foltyn-Dumitru, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Ignaz Reicht, Julius C. Holzschuh, Michael Bach, Bram Stieltjes, Kai Schlamp, Lena Maier-Hein, Marco Nolden, Ralf Floca, Paul F. J\"ager, Philipp Vollmuth, Fabian Isensee, Klaus H. Maier-Hein
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

Data-Efficient Networks for Multi-Contrast MRI Reconstruction based on a Generalized Content/Style Prior

The paper introduces CoSMo-RecNet, a modular framework for multi-contrast MRI reconstruction that operates effectively in low-data regimes. It leverages a reusable content/style prior learned from large, unpaired multi-contrast image datasets, allowing a lightweight unrolled network to refine reconstructions using only a few task‑specific training samples. Experiments on low‑field 0.3 T and ultra‑low‑field 47 mT datasets demonstrate that CoSMo-RecNet outperforms parameter‑matched MoDL, classical reconstruction, transfer learning, and zero‑shot methods, achieving higher quality with as few as five training subjects.

By Chinmay Rao, Efe Il{\i}cak, Matthias J. P. van Osch, Mariya Doneva, Laurens Beljaards, Navid Jabarimani, Nicola Pezzotti, Marius Staring
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

SlowFast-SCI: Slow-Fast Deep Unfolding Learning for Spectral Compressive Imaging

SlowFast‑SCI introduces a dual‑speed deep‑unfolding framework for spectral compressive imaging that combines a slow, pre‑trained backbone with a fast, test‑time adaptation stage. The slow phase distills a priors‑based model into a compact fast‑unfolding network, while the fast phase embeds lightweight modules that self‑supervise at test time without retraining the backbone. This design yields significant reductions in parameters and FLOPs, improves out‑of‑distribution PSNR by up to 5.79 dB, and accelerates adaptation four‑fold, all while remaining modular enough to integrate with any existing deep‑unfolding system.

By Haijin Zeng, Xuan Lu, Jiezhang Cao, Kai Zhang, Yurong Zhang, Qiangqiang Shen, Guoqing Chao, Li Jiang, Yongyong Chen, Jingyong Su, Jie Liu