AI safety and alignment

Alignment, interpretability, red-teaming, bias and privacy: the research on what these systems do when they misbehave.

17,896 stories · RSS feed

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 20

CVSD-Reg: Cross-Modal Visual Semantic Prior Distillation for Robust LiDAR Registration

Learning-based global point cloud registration has achieved remarkable progress, yet its reliance on geometric representations makes existing methods sensitive to variations in point density, scan pattern, viewpoint, and sensor characteristics. We propose CVSD-Reg, a robust global LiDAR registration framework that distills visual semantic priors from a vision foundation model into LiDAR representations.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

SCAPE: Scenario-Conditioned Simulation-Augmented Policy Evaluation

SCAPE is a scenario‑conditioned simulation‑augmented policy evaluation framework that predicts real‑world policy performance for specific scenarios using limited paired simulation‑and‑real samples and extensive simulation rollouts. It corrects sim‑to‑real bias in simulation labels before training the prediction model and calibrates prediction uncertainty via conformal prediction. Experiments on autonomous driving and quadruped velocity tracking show SCAPE reduces scenario‑level prediction error, improves testing sample efficiency, narrows calibrated prediction intervals, and generalizes better to out‑of‑distribution scenarios, enabling fine‑grained deployment strategies.

OpenAI Blog
Aug 19

Offering Zero Data Retention for frontier models

OpenAI announces that it will maintain Zero Data Retention for eligible API customers, ensuring that no user data is stored. The company also previews a new Private Safety Processing feature, which aims to enhance AI safety while preserving data privacy. These measures highlight OpenAI’s commitment to protecting user information in its frontier models.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

Beyond Trial Averaging: Anchoring Neural and Visual Representations for Few-Repetition Brain-to-Image Retrieval

The paper introduces NEAR, a neural‑anchor‑based retrieval framework that improves brain‑to‑image retrieval when only a few neural trials are available. By treating the high‑repetition center as an anchor, a denoiser pulls noisy queries toward it while a small network predicts pseudo anchors for candidate images, aligning both neural and visual representations. Across EEG, MEG, and fMRI datasets, NEAR consistently boosts retrieval accuracy, notably raising 200‑way Top‑1 accuracy on THINGS‑EEG2 by 5.7–9.3 percentage points with just one to four repetitions.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

Enhancing EBSD throughput of battery electrode materials using super-resolution generative adversarial networks

The paper presents a super‑resolution generative adversarial network (SRGAN) that boosts the throughput of electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) for Li‑ion battery electrode materials. By training on LiNixMnyCozO2 cathode data, the SRGAN outperforms classical interpolation across upscaling factors of 2× to 12×, especially preserving small grains and realistic boundaries. A 5× upscaling yields a 25× speed‑up or larger field of view with acceptable accuracy, reducing grain‑size errors to within ±15%.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

Introducing the Privacy-HSD Trade-off: Hate Speech Detection, but not at the Cost of Privacy

The paper introduces the privacy‑HSD trade‑off, highlighting that automatic hate speech detection systems can inadvertently compromise user privacy by encoding authorship. It demonstrates that such systems may achieve high performance at the expense of privacy, and proposes a new domain‑specific technique, AgnoSpeech, alongside other text privatization methods to balance these competing goals. The authors benchmark these methods, showing that while challenging, it is feasible to protect privacy without sacrificing hate‑speech detection effectiveness.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

GrabVG: Graph-Attentive Binding for Visual Grounding in UAV Imagery

GrabVG is a visual grounding framework for UAV imagery that tackles the challenges of small, densely packed, and visually similar objects by separating the task into preattentive hypothesis search and graph-attentive feature binding. It first generates a compact set of reliable object hypotheses using distillation-guided proposal induction and text-aware filtering, then constructs a sparse graph where language-guided visual cues and inter-instance topological relationships are jointly bound and propagated via graph attention. Experiments on AerialVG and AerialSense demonstrate that GrabVG achieves a strong accuracy–speed trade‑off, reaching 67.31% and 80.34% Acc@0.5 and outperforming baselines by 10.55 and 8.76 percentage points.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

Breaking the weakest link to evade vision language models

The paper investigates how Vision Language Models (VLMs) can be fooled by tiny, human‑imperceptible changes to images. It introduces a gradient‑based attack that targets only the vision encoder, reducing computational cost while still effectively disrupting both untargeted and targeted multimodal interpretations. Experiments on open‑source VLMs such as Qwen2.5‑VL, Granite‑Vision, FastVLM, and Phi‑3.5‑Vision demonstrate that these small perturbations can dramatically alter the models’ textual outputs.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

\textsc{TestifAI}: Tomography-Based Testing for Deep Learning Systems

TestifAI is a deep learning testing framework that estimates model robustness against combinations of input perturbations efficiently. It allows users to define structured spaces of semantic perturbations and severity levels, then query robustness for any combination. By employing partial model tomography, TestifAI reconstructs higher‑order perturbation effects from low‑order tests, achieving less than 7% error while cutting inference counts by 60‑80% on image and language classification tasks.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

TestifAI: Tomography-Based Testing for Deep Learning Systems

TestifAI is a deep learning testing framework that estimates model robustness against combinations of input perturbations efficiently. It allows users to define structured spaces of semantic perturbations and severity levels, then query robustness for any combination. By using partial model tomography, TestifAI reconstructs higher-order perturbation effects from low-order tests, achieving less than 7% error while reducing inferences by 60–80%.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

SIDScope: A Diagnostic Resource for Semantic-ID Interfaces in Generative Recommendation

SIDScope is a diagnostic tool that evaluates Semantic-ID mappings used between item tokenizers and generative recommenders. It normalizes artifacts, verifies provenance, profiles mapping structure, compares revisions, and tracks path-to-item outcomes in generated traces. Using data from Amazon and Yelp, SIDScope shows that interface health depends on multiple signals, revealing gaps in prefix alignment, trace accounting, and refresh handling that affect model reuse.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

To Go Far, Go Together: Diverse Preferences Induce a Curriculum for Reward Optimization

The paper introduces CurriPO, a tree‑structured curriculum that adapts to diverse user reward models in AI alignment. By automatically building a curriculum that branches and reuses reward models, it addresses the problem of users whose reward models are hard to optimize, a group often underserved by conventional methods. Experiments on personalized continuous control demonstrate that CurriPO improves population satisfaction by 1.2–2.1× over the best baseline while cutting training time.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

Decision-Metric Alignment in Latent World Models: Diagnostics and Action-Conditioned Objectives for MPC Planning

The paper investigates how latent world models (specifically JEPA-style models) use Euclidean distance to a goal latent as a cost for model‑predictive control (MPC). It introduces two metrics—Plan‑Real Spearman and CEM‑stage Spearman—to evaluate how well latent‑space distances align with real‑task progress, a property termed decision‑metric alignment. By identifying encoder distortion, terminal rollout error, and candidate margins as key factors, the authors propose DA‑LeWM, which augments the base model with inverse‑dynamics and demonstration‑conditioned goal‑action heads, leading to faster convergence and higher online success while maintaining similar probe scores.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

EgoHRV: Continuous Heart Rate Variability Estimation from Egocentric Systems for Autonomic Response and Skill Assessment

EgoHRV is a method that estimates heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate (HR) from the gaze cameras in egocentric headsets. It uses a 3D backbone and a low–high decomposition module to extract the blood volume pulse signal from gaze video, and aligns frequency‑domain representations of contact‑based and camera‑derived signals through cross‑domain pretraining. The approach achieves state‑of‑the‑art accuracy for HR and HRV estimation and, when integrated into EgoExo4D’s proficiency estimator, improves accuracy by 17.8%.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

A Critical Synthesis of Uncertainty Quantification and Foundation Models for Semantic Segmentation

The paper presents the first systematic evaluation of uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods applied to a foundation model for semantic segmentation. By fine‑tuning a lightweight DPT decoder on the pretrained SAM2 encoder, the authors benchmark four UQ approaches—Monte Carlo Dropout, Deep Sub‑Ensemble, Test‑Time Augmentation, and Evidential Deep Learning—across Cityscapes, NYUv2, and two out‑of‑domain settings. The study compares segmentation accuracy, calibration, uncertainty quality, and inference time, revealing trade‑offs between predictive performance, reliability, and computational cost.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

MemFuse: Multi-Source Memory Fusion from Fragmented Observations

MemFuse introduces a multi‑source memory fusion system and a corresponding benchmark, MemFuseBench, designed to evaluate agents that must integrate fragmented observations from multiple applications, devices, users, and time points. The benchmark uses a Scene‑to‑Sensor pipeline to generate source‑tagged observations, evidence‑grounded questions, and adversarial distractors, enabling systematic assessment of temporal reasoning, cross‑source evidence fusion, and noise robustness. Experiments show that MemFuse outperforms other memory systems across all evaluated LLM settings, especially on questions requiring cross‑source evidence fusion.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

When Safety Overrides Vision: Exploring Dynamics between Vision Influence and Safety Alignment in Vision-Language Models

Aligned vision‑language models (VLMs) are designed to combine grounded visual reasoning with safe generation. The study finds that when safety constraints are applied, these models often abstain from answering questions that they could answer under default instruction, yet visual evidence continues to influence the decoding process. The authors show that safety‑induced abstention alters late‑stage hidden‑state dynamics, and that targeted interventions can restore grounded answering without retraining or changing visual inputs.

arXiv AI
Aug 19

QuantumNovelty: A Skill-Orchestrating Language Agent for Referee-Style Review and Patentability Screening of Quantum Papers and Patents

QuantumNovelty is an open‑source, skill‑orchestrating language agent that both creates quantum‑computing artifacts—such as papers, ansatz candidates, and patent drafts—and evaluates them through simulated referee and patent‑examiner panels. Its core innovation is an audit‑and‑falsify layer of deterministic gates (Pareto domination, numerical recomputation, Wilson intervals, and cross‑vendor consensus) that restricts claims to those that survive rigorous checks, with every model call logged for transparency. In initial tests on a planted adversarial corpus and a small real‑world deployment, the system successfully flagged all overclaims without false positives and produced panels that were more conservative than typical public acceptance rates.

By Shlomo Kashani