Multimodal models

Vision-language models, speech and cross-modal systems that read, look and listen in the same forward pass.

8,098 stories · RSS feed

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 15

From Density to Biopsy Decisions and Malignancy Prediction: A Benchmark Study of Multimodal Large Language Models Against Radiologists in Digital and Contrast-Enhanced Mammography

arXiv:2609.14676v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Purpose: To compare four multimodal large language models (MLLMs) with radiologists of varying expertise in breast density assessment, BI-RADS assessme...

By Ali Abbasian Ardakani, Afshin Mohammadi, Taha Yusuf Kuzan, Beyza Nur Kuzan, Alisa Mohebbi, Masume Behruzi, Hamid Khorshidi, Ashkan Ghorbani, Elham Asadiara, Zeinab Khorshidi Lotfi, Ansar Rahman, Nedim Christoph Beste, U. Rajendra Acharya, Sepideh Hatamikia
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Transfer Learning for Socioeconomic Estimation in Forced-Displacement Settings

The paper presents a transfer‑learning approach that adapts a multimodal spatiotemporal vision transformer, originally trained on Demographic and Health Survey data, to estimate socioeconomic conditions in forced‑displacement settings. Using satellite‑derived geospatial covariates, the adapted model explains up to 66% of variation in socioeconomic outcomes in camp‑intersecting grids and 41% in non‑camp areas, achieving mean absolute errors of 4.37 and 5.41 index points respectively. This framework supplements periodic household surveys by providing regularly updated, spatially granular socioeconomic estimates that bridge data gaps between survey rounds.

By Steven Ndung'u, Adel Daoud, Ismael Yacoubou Djima, Hai-Anh H. Dang, Patrick Michael Brock
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Enhancing Large Language Model-Based Systems for End-to-End Circuit Analysis Problem Solving

The paper introduces an enhanced end‑to‑end circuit analysis framework built on Gemini 2.5 Pro, targeting engineering education. It addresses two key failure modes—circuit‑recognition hallucinations and reasoning‑process hallucinations—by adding a YOLO detector for source polarity re‑identification and an ngspice verification loop for iterative refinement. The resulting pipeline achieves 97.59 % accuracy on 83 undergraduate problems, markedly outperforming the baseline Gemini model and demonstrating significant gains across varied diagram styles and textbooks.

By Liangliang Chen, Weiyu Sun, Huiru Xie, Yongnuo Cai, Ying Zhang
arXiv AI
Sep 15

DuoTok: Source-Aware Dual-Track Music Tokenization for Vocal-Accompaniment Generation

DuoTok is a source‑aware dual‑track music tokenizer designed for vocal‑accompaniment generation. It first learns a semantic audio representation via self‑supervised pretraining, then refines source‑aware structure with feature‑replacement noise and multi‑task supervision (spectral reconstruction, source separation regularization, and an ASR head for lyric alignment). The encoder is frozen and hard‑routed codebooks for vocals and accompaniment are learned, while a diffusion decoder restores fine acoustic detail from the discrete tokens, achieving a favorable predictability‑fidelity trade‑off at ultra‑low bitrate across public benchmarks.

By Rui Lin, Zhiyue Wu, Jiahe Lei, Kangdi Wang, Weixiong Chen, Junyu Dai, Tao Jiang
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Freeze, Share, Shrink: Rethinking the Action Backbone in Diffusion Policies

The paper argues that diffusion-based action policies can use a frozen, observation‑free backbone as a reusable trajectory prior, with task adaptation handled entirely by the conditioning pathway. By pretraining a general action head on forward‑kinematics data and then freezing it, the authors show that a single backbone can match or outperform normally trained models on MimicGen and LIBERO. Their experiments reveal that a small 5 M‑parameter MLP backbone can rival large U‑Net and transformer backbones, indicating that action backbones are often over‑parameterized and that image‑style architectures may not be the best fit for low‑dimensional action generation.

By Jian Zhou, Sihao Lin, Shuai Fu, Zerui Li, Gengze Zhou, Qi WU
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 15

Q-SiT: Teaching LMMs for Image Quality Scoring and Interpreting

Q‑SiT is a unified framework that trains large multimodal models to perform both image quality scoring and interpreting simultaneously. By converting standard IQA datasets into question‑answer pairs and adding human‑annotated interpreting data, the model learns to quantify overall quality and describe perceived attributes. An efficient balance strategy optimizes data mix ratios on lightweight models before scaling to full‑size LMMs, reducing computational cost while improving cross‑task knowledge transfer.

By Zicheng Zhang, Haoning Wu, Ziheng Jia, Weisi Lin, Guangtao Zhai
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 15

ViCo-SAM3: Vision-Conditioned Alignment for Open-Vocabulary Camouflaged Object Segmentation

ViCo-SAM3 introduces a Vision-Conditioned alignment framework for open-vocabulary camouflaged object segmentation. The approach adds a vision-conditioned (ViCo) module that dynamically adjusts text embeddings based on global visual context, and a vision-conditioned cross-modal binding (ViCoBind) module to improve interaction between visual and textual representations. These innovations close the semantic gap between text and pixel-level cues, enabling state‑of‑the‑art performance on the OVCamo benchmark without heavy parameter overhead.

By Qiangqiang Zhou, Wenjun Tang, Yong Chen, Dandan Zhu, Jiawei Xu
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 15

Query-Conditioned Spherical Centroid Aggregation for Multimodal Retrieval

The paper introduces SCALAR, a query‑conditioned spherical centroid aggregator that assigns relevance‑based weights to each available modality before computing a spherical centroid. SCALAR supports arbitrary modality subsets, is trained with rank‑8 LoRA adapters on masked views, and achieves positive aggregation gains on four of five benchmarks, outperforming prior symmetric aggregators. With only 4.8 million trainable parameters, SCALAR attains the highest text‑to‑video R@1 on three benchmarks and surpasses the released GRAM checkpoint under test‑time modality dropout by 3.2 to 10.9 R@1.

By Ambuj Mehrish, Anindya Nag, Sebastiano Vascon