arXiv:2607. 16213v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) generate text autoregressively, relying on a key-value (KV) cache whose memory footprint grows linearly with context length, creating a major bottleneck.
By Soumia Bouyahiaoui, Manel Kara laouar, Aicha Boutorh, Mohamed Hadj Ameur
arXiv:2607. 16209v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Context reranking and pruning have become essential for improving the efficiency of modern Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, yet an interpretable and unified framework remains underexplored.
By Yanqiao Chen, Dongsheng Hou, Yuhan Rui, Zhen Cao, Yepang Liu
arXiv:2607. 16819v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In recent years, large-scale vision-language models have been driving a paradigm shift in intelligent remote sensing image interpretation.
By Yi Yang, Xiaokun Zhang, Yuxuan Li, Ruyi Zhang, Xinpeng Zhou, Haipeng Wang
arXiv:2607. 16727v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autoregressive multimodal large language models (MLLMs) suffer from error snowballing: a single incorrect inference early in a chainof-thought (CoT) trace corrupts all downstream reasoning.
By Zehua Cheng, Wei Dai, Jiahao Sun
arXiv:2607. 17038v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper addresses key technical challenges in current large language model (LLM) agent applications, including long-horizon planning, sparse reward attribution, and dynamic environmental interaction, by designing and optimizing an intelligent agent workflow.
By Amez Amanj Ali, Kuo-Kun Tseng
arXiv:2607. 17063v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has led practitioners to increasingly rely on them for answering questions about hardware description languages (HDLs).
By Ziteng Hu, Jiachi Chen, Wenhao Lv, Huan Zhang, Yingjie Xia
arXiv:2607. 17283v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Single-stream autoregressive decoding of large language models is bound by memory bandwidth: each generated token requires one full forward pass through the target model, and successive passes cannot be parallelized.
By Param Chordiya
arXiv:2607. 16232v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The growing use of statistical learning algorithms to infer human preferences from high-dimensional choice data runs up against a fundamental challenge: choice alternatives typically differ in many ways simultaneously, so it is generally unclear which factors actually drove an observed decision and should be credited as preferences.
By Zachary Wojtowicz, Ayush Nayak, Jacob Andreas
arXiv:2607. 17269v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models encode world models implicitly in neural weights, which exposes four structural risks in high-precision domains such as medicine and finance: hallucination, frozen knowledge, poor explainability, and poor modifiability.
By Zhanbo Li, Shifeng Wu, Xiangjin Meng, Wenjie Cai
arXiv:2607. 16202v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI democratization is not primarily a question of matching frontier-scale generality; it is a question of whether capable models can be selected, audited, and specialized under hardware and governance constraints that ordinary institutions can actually satisfy.
By Daniel Cersosimo
arXiv:2607. 17625v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern video transformers typically ignore principles from primate vision and are rarely evaluated against neural data, limiting their biological interpretability.
By Amir Hosein Fadaei, Mahyar Maleki, Mohammad-Reza A. Dehaqani
arXiv:2607. 17598v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-document question answering usually forces a choice between loading the whole document into the context window and bolting on a separate retriever.
By Yifeng He, Yinzhe Zhao, Jicheng Wang, Hao Chen
arXiv:2607. 17575v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose ARBITER, a novel LLM guardrail framework that introduces two key ideas: (i) dual-hypothesis reasoning, a reasoning method for LLM guardrails that explicitly considers both safe and unsafe interpretations of a prompt before making a safety decision, and (ii) multi-component supervised fine-tuning (MC-SFT), a structured training loss for reasoning-based guardrails that decomposes LLM outputs into logical components and weights them according to their importance.
By Md Asiful Islam, Mihai Surdeanu
arXiv:2607. 17701v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Proactive agents are expected to anticipate user needs and provide autonomous assistance by perceiving environmental context without explicit instructions.
By Guanzhen Li, Liangming Pan, Leye Wang
arXiv:2607. 17641v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Verify-repair loops are a standard means for large language model (LLM) agents to correct faulty plans in code generation, mathematical reasoning, and tool use.
By Yitao Wu, Si Shen, Rui Yang, Hong Peng, Bin Hu
arXiv:2607. 17652v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Block-wise diffusion large language models (dLLMs) decode sequentially at the block level, enabling effective KV-cache reuse across blocks but making inter-block decoding strictly serial.
By Bing Tian, Haikun Liu, Xiaocheng Zhong, Zhuohui Duan, Zhaokai Luo, Huayi Jin, Zhiyong Wang, Xiaofei Liao
arXiv:2607. 17779v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Text-to-Image (T2I) generative models have achieved remarkable progress in synthesizing high-quality visual content, yet they remain vulnerable to adversarial misuse, particularly in generating Not-Safe-For-Work (NSFW) images.
By Dongdong Yang, Deyue Zhang, Zhao Liu, Zonghao Ying, Wenzhuo Xu, Jiankai Jin, Xiangzheng Zhang, Quanchen Zou
arXiv:2607. 17806v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-Language Navigation (VLN) requires an embodied agent to interpret a natural-language instruction and predict actions from temporally ordered visual observations.
By Li Xian, Mingxi Li, Yizheng Wang, Yiming Shen, Qi Chen, Zhuoling Xiao
arXiv:2607. 18082v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Rubric-based RL has recently shown promise in improving LLMs on open-ended tasks.
By Mingxuan Xia, Yuhang Yang, Chao Ye, Shuai Zhu, Shenzhi Yang, Guangcheng Zhu, Yuhang Zhang, Cheng Peng, Haobo Wang, Siqing Wang
arXiv:2607. 18086v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Background: LLM judges increasingly score whether clinical language models give overconfident answers under incomplete evidence, yet whether a measured "safety gain" reflects real behavior change or the judge's calibration is unresolved.
By Koyar Afrasyab