arXiv:2511.10661v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: It is increasingly important to evaluate the characteristics of systems based on large language models (LLMs). Evaluations in this context often re...
By Saatvik Kher, Shang Wu, Rachel Longjohn, Catarina Bel\'em, Padhraic Smyth
arXiv:2603.02561v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Attention mechanism remains the defining operator in Transformers since it provides expressive global credit assignment, yet its quadratic co...
By Chenghao Zhang, Chao Feng, Yuanhao Pu, Xunyong Yang, Wenhui Yu, Xiang Li, Chunjie Chen, Kaiqiao Zhan
arXiv:2603.28013v4 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Multi-agent LLM systems now read documents, web pages and tool results on behalf of users, yet their resistance to prompt injection is usuall...
By Haochuan Kevin Wang, Zechen Zhang
arXiv:2604.02543v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: As vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed in clinical decision support, more than accuracy is required: knowing when to trust thei...
By Ji Young Byun, Young-Jin Park, Jean-Philippe Corbeil, Asma Ben Abacha
arXiv:2605.10851v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We initiate the study of the Generalized Turing Test (GTT), a formal generalization of Turing's imitation game from humans to arbitrary interactive...
By Daniel Mitropolsky, Riccardo Neumarker, Emanuele Rimoldi, Susan S. Hong, Tomaso Poggio
The paper investigates how inference optimization for large language models can introduce numerical inconsistencies that trigger hidden backdoors. It introduces two types of optimization‑triggered backdoors: the Input‑Specific Optimization Backdoor (ISOB) and the Universal Optimization Backdoor (UOB), the latter enabling a model to remain benign under normal execution but activate a backdoor when optimization is applied. Experiments on seven open‑source LLMs, across multiple tasks and optimization backends, show UOB can achieve up to 100% attack success while maintaining clean accuracy, and the authors propose three defenses that reduce the attack success rate to 0.02.
By Yifei Wang, Yida Yang, Tianlin Li, Xiaohan Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Li Pan
arXiv:2609.32259v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Recent multi-agent LLM systems increasingly combine heterogeneous models for specialized agent roles. However, text-based communication requires ea...
By Vincent-Daniel Yun, Woosang Lim, Haneul Yoo, Sungjoo Yoo, Murali Annavaram, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy
arXiv:2609.38181v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Survival analysis estimates time-to-event outcomes from patient covariates and is widely used for medical risk assessment. Patients seeking prognostic...
By Juan M Zambrano Chaves, Peniel Argaw, Risa Ueno, Carlo Bifulco, Kristina Young, Rom Leidner, Tristan Naumann, Hoifung Poon
arXiv:2609.38260v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Values such as honesty, autonomy, and confidentiality are often regarded as general principles underpinning AI alignment. However, what it means to a...
By Olivia Macmillan-Scott, Mirco Musolesi
The paper introduces NinaXander, a method for composing frozen language models from different architecture families by inserting a trained shared‑latent adapter between their layers. By running the initial layers of one model, converting the intermediate representation with the adapter, and then continuing with the remaining layers of another model, multiple composed models can be created without retraining. Experiments with RWKV and Pythia show that while some compositions preserve syntactic quality and reduce memory usage, none match the parent model’s accuracy and language‑modeling performance drops on out‑of‑domain data.
By Takanori Kotama, Shun-ichiro Hayashi, Daichi Mukunoki, Tetsuya Hoshino, Takahiro Katagiri
The paper investigates how conversational safety in language models degrades over extended, adversarial interactions. By testing three instruction‑tuned models with persistent adversarial users across up to 101 turns, the study finds that safe‑response rates drop sharply from 85–100% at the first turn to 15–44% by the end. This demonstrates that strong single‑turn safety does not guarantee continued safety in long conversations.
By Parisa Salmani, Peter R. Lewis
arXiv:2609.38406v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Access to real-world information is often noisy and fragmented. Constructing a coherent narrative from such fragments requires models to reconstruct mi...
By Eftekhar Hossain, John Salvador, Santu Karmaker
arXiv:2609.38510v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive LLMs by having a lightweight drafter propose tokens that the target model verifies in parallel. Diffusi...
By Longxuan Yu, Bingsen Chen, Peng Shi, Dongkyu Lee, Yi Xiang, Hideo Kobayashi, Sheng Zhang, Shuaichen Chang, Xing Niu, Zhuoyan Xu, Greg Ver Steeg, Jiarong Jiang
arXiv:2609.38799v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Understanding multi-perspective alternative narratives requires identifying how their information agrees, conflicts, or differs across sources. Existin...
By Eftekhar Hossain, Santu Karmaker
arXiv:2609.38802v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Uncontrolled repetition can prolong autoregressive generation in large language models (LLMs) and enable resource consumption attacks. Prior analyses...
By Yuanhe Zhang, Xinyao Zhou, Haoran Gao, Yuyao Zhang, Zhenhong Zhou, Fanyu Meng, Li Sun, Sen Su
StateTree is a reinforcement learning approach that improves long‑term dialogue reasoning by building a tree‑structured auxiliary task from limited dialogue data. The method embeds key‑value records across multiple sessions into a binary tree, requiring the model to traverse from root to leaf, retrieve records, compare timestamps, and identify a target question among distractors. Curriculum RL training increases tree depth, and a compositional variant trains the model to combine partial reasoning fragments, enabling cross‑session retrieval, temporal reasoning, knowledge updates, and multi‑hop reasoning while generalizing from 10K‑token to 128K‑token contexts.
By Naen Xu, Wanqing Cui, Yibo Hu, Shixin Hong, Hengyu An, Meiguang Jin, Junfeng Ma, Tianyu Du
arXiv:2609.38816v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: While multi-agent and model collaboration algorithms gain traction to combine the strengths of diverse Large Language Models (LLMs), existing systems r...
By Zongwan Cao, Ziyuan Yang, Shangbin Feng, Michael Duan, Skyler Hallinan, Bingbing Wen, Lucy Lu Wang, Yulia Tsvetkov
arXiv:2609.38923v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Working agents need to read diverse files, coordinate tools, and produce deliverables. Training such agents requires tasks built on many real files wit...
By Qisheng Su, Hanchen Wang, Guanru Zhu, Huicheng Jiang, Qiuyinzhe Zhang, Kou Shi, Zhen Fang, Ziao Zhang, Qingnan Ren, Zehui Chen, Tao Gui, Feng Zhao
arXiv:2609.39001v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: LLM services are billed per token and context windows are measured in tokens, yet the number of tokens needed for the same content varies across lang...
By Thomas Serval
arXiv:2609.39013v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: EVICALC, our system for the DocSem shared task, achieved 8.61% joint accuracy on 1,730 tasks in the official final test evaluation. It reads a PDF, sel...
By Divya Godara, Sachin Gupta