Benchmarks and evaluation

Leaderboards, eval harnesses and ablations — the contested business of deciding which model is actually better.

28,147 stories · RSS feed

arXiv AI
Oct 1

ChartDensity-Bench: Benchmarking MLLMs for Numerical Data Reconstruction under Visual Density

ChartDensity-Bench is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on their ability to reconstruct structured numerical data from scientific charts that vary in visual density. The benchmark uses charts paired with source-level ground-truth data and systematically changes the number of simultaneously presented charts (k = 1, 3, 6, 9) to assess how density affects reconstruction performance. A multi‑dimensional evaluation framework measures structural reliability, reconstruction completeness, parseability, and numerical fidelity, revealing that numerical reconstruction generally worsens as visual density increases, with varying degrees of degradation across different models.

By Xinhe Wu, Yadong Jin
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Right Answers, Costly Models: The Efficiency Gap in LLM-based Optimization Modeling

The paper introduces OptTips, a knowledge base of 50 expert optimization modeling techniques, and OptDachshund, a multi‑agent framework that generates mathematical models and solver code from natural‑language problem descriptions. Using these tools, the authors create the EfficientOpt benchmark, comprising 561 expert‑reviewed tasks with paired reference implementations, to evaluate large language models (LLMs) on both correctness and computational efficiency. Their experiments with 11 LLMs show a consistent efficiency gap: even when LLMs produce correct solutions, the resulting programs often take longer to solve than expert‑crafted counterparts, highlighting the need to assess both accuracy and runtime performance in LLM‑based optimization modeling.

By Zhong Li, Xin Huang, Jinhui Wan, Xiangyi Wang, Shenkai Zhang, Ruiqi Chen, Wenyu Liu, Zaiwen Wen, Ziyan Luo
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Unlearning Deceptive Behaviors in LLMs with Contrastive Forget Sets

The paper introduces PACT, a method for unlearning deceptive behaviors in large language models by using contrastive forget sets that compare a model’s responses under deceptive and neutral contexts. PACT trains the model to produce pressure‑aware counterfactual targets, preserving benign system‑prompt adherence and reasoning traces while dramatically reducing deception rates from over 50% to under 3% on 32B reasoning models.

By Haoran Tang, Rajiv Khanna
arXiv AI
Oct 1

GFD-OPD: Guidance-Folded On-Policy Distillation of Diffusion Models Across Scales

The paper introduces GFD-OPD, a method for on‑policy distillation of diffusion models that addresses challenges when compressing large teachers into smaller students. It identifies that standard distillation fails due to distribution gaps and classifier‑free guidance amplification, and proposes Fixed‑State KL to measure these gaps. GFD‑OPD reduces the student‑teacher discrepancy and achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance across multiple benchmarks.

By Zhenxing Zhang, Jiayan Teng, Wenxu Wu, Zhuoyi Yang, Jiazheng Xu, Wendi Zheng, Jie Tang, Dan Guo, Meng Wang
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Probabilistic Adversarial Training

The paper introduces probabilistic adversarial training, a method that enhances robustness by reducing the overlap between a distance-based distribution and a victim-classifier-induced distribution. It derives a KL-based lower bound on probabilistic robustness, which serves as a tractable surrogate objective. Experiments confirm that this approach consistently improves probabilistic robustness and can even boost non-probabilistic adversarial training methods through an induced scaling factor.

By Andi Zhang, Xingyu Zhao, Siddartha Khastgir
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Inference Auctions

The paper proposes an inference auction for large language model (LLM) APIs, enabling users to bid for faster service when compute demand exceeds capacity. The auction allocates priority efficiently without increasing latency, and includes fast algorithms for truthful bidding and an autobidding agent that adjusts bids within a user’s budget to maximize utility. Experiments show the auction improves system welfare while preserving the cache utilization and latency benefits of the SGLang inference framework.

By Keegan Harris, Siddharth Prasad, Asher Trockman, Nika Haghtalab, Michael I. Jordan
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Self-Evolving Harness on Multiple Tasks with the Agent as Its Own Optimizer

The paper introduces a self‑evolving harness framework where a frozen language‑model agent first solves tasks and then edits its own harness based on run records. Using a 49‑line seed harness, the evolved harness improves average scores on in‑distribution benchmarks by 4.48 points and on out‑of‑distribution benchmarks by 12.64 points, surpassing Codex on the former and matching it on the latter. Continued evolution on a specific out‑of‑distribution benchmark further raises performance, and the study analyzes emergent mechanisms such as output truncation and history compaction.

By Qiankai Xu
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 1

GazeFlow: From Human Gaze Behavior to Generative Egocentric Gaze Prediction

GazeFlow is a new framework for egocentric gaze prediction that models gaze as a joint distribution of temporal positions conditioned on both top‑down task cues and bottom‑up visual saliency. It employs conditional flow matching to iteratively transform Gaussian noise into realistic gaze trajectories, using a velocity field informed by video‑encoded visual features and global task queries. On standard benchmarks, GazeFlow outperforms existing methods on per‑frame metrics and produces trajectories that better reflect human gaze dynamics.

By Sheng Zhao, Weikai Lin, Yuhao Zhu