arXiv:2609.38816v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While multi-agent and model collaboration algorithms gain traction to combine the strengths of diverse Large Language Models (LLMs), existing systems r...
arXiv:2603. 20324v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-agent LLM pipelines produce contradictory evidence on whether team diversity improves output quality: heterogeneous Mixture-of-Agents teams outperform single models, yet homogeneous Self-MoA teams consistently win under synthesis-based aggregation.
arXiv:2607. 27177v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Effective collaboration with novel and diverse partners is a crucial skill for autonomous agents.
arXiv:2607. 29087v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in enterprise settings, yet individual models remain bounded by model-specific capability limitations.
arXiv:2504. 03991v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding how humans collaborate and communicate in teams is essential for improving human-agent teaming and AI-assisted decision-making.
arXiv:2510. 25340v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Learning to collaborate with various unfamiliar teammates poses a great challenge in the domain of multi-agent systems.
arXiv:2607. 02198v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human-AI teaming has received increasing attention in the literature.
arXiv:2606. 10906v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study models for human-AI teaming through the lens of statistical calibration.
The paper introduces Steiner’s taxonomy of group tasks to study how multi‑agent large language model (LLM) teams scale on disjunctive versus compensatory tasks. By modeling agents as conditionally independent given the item, it shows that plurality voting converges to the modal answer while averaging converges to the item‑level bias. Experiments with 13 open‑weight models and up to 30 agents reveal that disjunctive tasks benefit from larger teams, whereas compensatory tasks like Fermi estimation see little improvement, highlighting that task structure and aggregation method fundamentally determine team scaling.
arXiv:2606. 01490v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a controlled experiment evaluating 12 multi-agent LLM collaboration topologies for software architecture design.
arXiv:2602. 17737v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Mutual adaptation is a central challenge in human-AI teaming, as humans naturally adjust their strategies in response to an AI agent's behavior.
arXiv:2604. 22891v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM-as-a-Judge has become a dominant approach in automated evaluation systems, playing critical roles in model alignment, leaderboard construction, quality control, and so on.