Which Models Work Well Together? Measuring Heterogeneity for LLM Team Selection
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
arXiv:2609.38816v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While multi-agent and model collaboration algorithms gain traction to combine the strengths of diverse Large Language Models (LLMs), existing systems r...
arXiv:2603. 20324v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-agent LLM pipelines produce contradictory evidence on whether team diversity improves output quality: heterogeneous Mixture-of-Agents teams outperform single models, yet homogeneous Self-MoA teams consistently win under synthesis-based aggregation.
arXiv:2607. 27177v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Effective collaboration with novel and diverse partners is a crucial skill for autonomous agents.
arXiv:2607. 29087v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in enterprise settings, yet individual models remain bounded by model-specific capability limitations.
arXiv:2504. 03991v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding how humans collaborate and communicate in teams is essential for improving human-agent teaming and AI-assisted decision-making.
arXiv:2510. 25340v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Learning to collaborate with various unfamiliar teammates poses a great challenge in the domain of multi-agent systems.