Benchmarks and evaluation

Leaderboards, eval harnesses and ablations — the contested business of deciding which model is actually better.

28,111 stories · RSS feed

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 21

EvaOmni: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Audio-Visual Reasoning

EvaOmni is a new evidence‑grounded benchmark for audio‑visual reasoning, comprising 392 videos and 1,027 human‑annotated question‑answer pairs that span 15 capabilities and three difficulty levels. The benchmark requires models to provide both an answer and the supporting audio‑visual evidence intervals, and introduces Coverage Grounded (C.G.) and Bottleneck Grounded (B.G.) scores to evaluate evidence identification and temporal localization. Across 24 Omni LLMs, Gemini3.7‑Flash achieved the highest overall accuracy, yet its B.G. scores reveal significant room for improvement in grounded reasoning.

By Xiaoxing Hu, Wenxi Yao, Chaoyuan Shi, Ziqi Ye, Xiaorong Guo, Peixuan Li, Zhuoran Sun, Ziyang Gong, Peiyuan Zhang, Mingxin Liu, Shuran Ma, Hongbo Liu, Xiaomin Yu, Yu Tian, Wentao Wang, Zhenjie Yang, Jian Hu, Yunhang Shen, Haoyu Cao, Xue Yang
arXiv AI
Oct 21

When Health Assistants Agree Too Readily: A Benchmark of Time-Critical Self-Diagnosis

The paper introduces SelfDx, a benchmark that tests whether AI models appropriately respond to health queries by either cautioning against self-diagnosis or agreeing when evidence rules out serious alternatives. It evaluates 27 frontier models on 100 paired cases, finding that most models inappropriately agree in caution-required scenarios, achieving only a 77.0% appropriate caution rate. The study shows that prompt engineering can raise caution but at the cost of agreement, while supervised fine‑tuning on balanced examples improves both metrics.

By Marilyn Zhang, Tianfeng Chen, Patricia M Pechter, Mark E. Whiting
arXiv AI
Oct 21

MemDev-Bench: Does Memory Help Code Agents?Benchmarking Memory Systems over Real Repository Histories

MemDev-Bench is a new benchmark that evaluates how memory systems influence code agents across diverse repository histories. It pairs each task with relevance‑annotated earlier tasks from the same repository, creating 4,869 historical tasks for 555 base tasks and an automated pipeline that ensures these tasks are executable and verifiable. The study finds that memory mainly improves fine‑grained localization and editing, but can also cause failures when agents reuse memory without reassessing its applicability, and that providing raw historical trajectories reduces steps more effectively than compressed memories.

By Guorui Chen, Tao Liu, Zhenzhen Huang, Yidan Zhang, Liyu Jiang, Shuoyuan Wang, Hanchen Sun, Xu He, Dong Li, Yihan Hu, Jianye Hao, Lei Feng