AI agents

Tool use, function calling, orchestration and the protocols that let models act rather than only answer.

15,986 stories · RSS feed

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 25

Neglected Free Lunch from Post-training: Progress Advantage for LLM Agents

arXiv:2606. 26080v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Process reward models enable fine-grained, step-level evaluation of LLMs, yet building them for agentic settings remains prohibitively difficult: long-horizon interactions, irreversible actions, and stochastic environment feedback make both human annotation and Monte Carlo estimation infeasible at scale.

By Changdae Oh, Wendi Li, Seongheon Park, Samuel Yeh, Tanwi Mallick, Sharon Li
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 25

Stagnant Neuron: Towards Understanding the Plasticity Loss in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Value Factorization Methods

arXiv:2606. 25335v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) value factorization methods can suffer from a loss of plasticity, gradually failing to adapt when transferring to new task instances.

By Zhengzhu Liu, Zeming Gao, Haoyuan Qin, Jiawei Hu, Junhao Wu, Miao Zhu, Haipeng Zhang, Chennan Ma, Siqi Shen, Cheng Wang
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 25

Autodata: An agentic data scientist to create high quality synthetic data

arXiv:2606. 25996v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce Autodata, a general method that enables AI agents to act as data scientists who build high quality training and evaluation data.

By Ilia Kulikov, Chenxi Whitehouse, Tianhao Wu, Yixin Nie, Swarnadeep Saha, Eryk Helenowski, Weizhe Yuan, Olga Golovneva, Jack Lanchantin, Yoram Bachrach, Jakob Foerster, Xian Li, Han Fang, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jason Weston
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 25

Fox in the Henhouse: Supply-Chain Backdoor Attacks Against Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2505. 19532v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The current state-of-the-art backdoor attacks against Reinforcement Learning (RL) rely upon unrealistically permissive access models, that assume the attacker can read (or even write) the victim's policy parameters, observations, or rewards.

By Shijie Liu, Andrew C. Cullen, Paul Montague, Sarah Erfani, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 25

Quantization Inflates Reasoning: Token Inflation as a Hidden Cost of Low-Bit Reasoning Models

arXiv:2606. 25519v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantization is widely used to reduce the inference cost of large language models, but its effect on reasoning models is not fully captured by final-answer accuracy or per-token latency.

By Xinyu Lian, Walid Krichene, Beichen Huang, Masahiro Tanaka, Olatunji Ruwase, Li Zhang, Minjia Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 25

Project Auto-World: Towards Automated Benchmarking of Neural Relational Reasoners

arXiv:2606. 24965v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reasoning about relational structures remains a significant challenge for neural models, particularly when they must systematically apply learned knowledge to problem instances that are harder than those seen in training.

By Anirban Das, Joanne Boisson, Irtaza Khalid, Sumita Garai, Steven Schockaert
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 25

Agentic evolution of physically constrained foundation models

arXiv:2606. 25532v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence increasingly drives automated scientific discovery, yet contemporary generalist agents lack physical grounding, frequently hallucinating hardware-incompatible designs.

By Jiangwei Zhang, Wen Sun, Chong Wang, Shiyao Li, Cheng Che, Chunjing Han, Dan Meng, Jian Yang, Yu Wang, Rui Hou