arXiv Computation and Language By Kento Haneda, Yosuke Kishinami, Ryo Fujii, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Makoto Morishita

WikiOriginQA: Automated Construction of a QA Dataset with Knowledge Origins for Analyzing Cultural Bias

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

WikiOriginQA is a newly introduced QA dataset that is automatically constructed by using the creation dates of different Wikipedia language editions to represent the origins of knowledge. The dataset allows for the analysis of cultural bias in large language models, with experiments showing a bias toward Anglophone cultures and highlighting the importance of knowledge propagation into the Anglosphere. This automated approach offers scalable cultural bias evaluation across diverse languages without extensive manual annotation.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Aug 18

CulTrace: Tracing Internal Cultural Reasoning in Large Language Models

arXiv:2508. 08879v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The growing deployment of large language models (LLMs) across diverse cultural contexts necessitates a deeper understanding of models' hidden representations of different cultures.

By Haeun Yu, Arnav Arora Seogyeong Jeong, Nadav Borenstein, Siddhesh Pawar, Jisu Shin, Jiho Jin, Junho Myung, Alice Oh, Isabelle Augenstein
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Why are all LLMs Obsessed with Japanese Culture? On the Hidden Cultural and Regional Biases of LLMs

The paper investigates cultural biases in large language models (LLMs) by introducing the Culture-Related Open Questions (CROQ) dataset, which contains 24‑language questions about generic culture. Experiments reveal that LLMs disproportionately favor Japan in their responses, especially when prompted in high‑resource languages, while low‑resource languages tend to highlight countries where the language is official. The study also finds that these biases emerge after supervised fine‑tuning rather than during pre‑training.

By Joseba Fernandez de Landa, Carla Perez-Almendros, Jose Camacho-Collados
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 2

Camellia: Benchmarking Cultural Biases in LLMs for Asian Languages

Camellia is a new benchmark that tests cultural bias in large language models (LLMs) across nine Asian languages and six Asian cultures. It contains 19,530 manually annotated entities linked to Asian or Western cultures and 2,173 masked social‑media contexts for these entities. Using Camellia, the authors evaluate four multilingual LLMs on cultural context adaptation, sentiment association, and entity extractive QA, finding that models struggle with cultural adaptation, exhibit differing biases across regions and families, and have difficulty understanding context in some Asian languages.

By Tarek Naous, Anagha Savit, Carlos Rafael Catalan, Geyang Guo, Jaehyeok Lee, Kyungdon Lee, Lheane Marie Dizon, Mengyu Ye, Neel Kothari, Sahajpreet Singh, Sarah Masud, Tanish Patwa, Trung Thanh Tran, Zohaib Khan, Alan Ritter, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Yuki Arase, Keisuke Sakaguchi, JinYeong Bak, Wei Xu
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 8

When Trivia Is Not Trivial: Everyday Knowledge Failures in Multilingual LLMs

The paper introduces TriviaRoomQA, a multilingual benchmark of 3,300 parallel multiple-choice questions across 288 topics, plus an additional 5,340 French-only questions. It evaluates 30 open-weight large language models (7–70 B parameters) from various regions, finding strong performance on knowledge-intensive subjects like history and geography but weaker results on everyday popular‑culture topics such as celebrities, music, movies, and news. The study also shows that model performance varies across languages for the same questions, indicating that factual knowledge access is not always language‑independent.

By Anna Mosolova, Djam\'e Seddah