arXiv:2608. 02486v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Open-source LLMs reliably name Zeus, Jupiter, and Thor, but recover their counterparts in less-represented traditions like Finnish, Slavic, Egyptian, or Chinese mythology far less consistently.
By Iaroslav Chelombitko, Ekaterina Chelombitko, Mika H\"am\"al\"ainen
arXiv:2609.00491v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Communicating across cultures is inherently challenging, especially through culturally dense and ambiguous formats like memes. While people expect larg...
By Hangxiao Zhu, Suliu Qin, Zhuoyan Li, Ming Jiang, Yu Zhang, Meng Xia
arXiv:2601. 14063v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Cross-cultural competence in large language models (LLMs) requires understanding and adapting Culture-Specific Items (CSIs) across varying cultural contexts.
By Mohsinul Kabir, Tasnim Ahmed, Md Mezbaur Rahman, Shaoxiong Ji, Hassan Alhuzali, Yuechen Jiang, Jimin Huang, Sophia Ananiadou
arXiv:2606. 07422v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly used to answer culturally grounded questions across languages, yet it remains unclear whether local cultural knowledge is better accessed through English or the local language.
By Yang Zhang, Xiao Fei, Amr Mohamed, Sarah Almeida Carneiro, Mersin Konomi, Mingmeng Geng, Ahmed Asaad, Guokan Shang, Michalis Vazirgiannis
The paper investigates cultural biases in large language models (LLMs) by introducing the Culture-Related Open Questions (CROQ) dataset, which contains 24‑language questions about generic culture. Experiments reveal that LLMs disproportionately favor Japan in their responses, especially when prompted in high‑resource languages, while low‑resource languages tend to highlight countries where the language is official. The study also finds that these biases emerge after supervised fine‑tuning rather than during pre‑training.
By Joseba Fernandez de Landa, Carla Perez-Almendros, Jose Camacho-Collados
CHARM is a multicultural benchmark that tests large language models’ ability to adopt a character’s style while respecting knowledge boundaries. It includes 40 real and fictional characters from five cultural-linguistic regions and evaluates two boundary types—Temporal and Cross-Universe—using abstention-enabled multiple-choice questions. The study finds that hallucinations mainly stem from compliance failures: models often recognize a query is out of scope yet still provide out-of-character answers, revealing systematic cultural variations in these errors.
By Sunkyung Han, Nahyeon Park, Gaeun Seo, Seunghyun Yoon, JinYeong Bak