arXiv:2605.10659v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Digital personas powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed as substitutes for human survey respondents, yet it remains uncl...
By Mumin Jia, Yilin Chen, Divya Sharma, Jairo Diaz-Rodriguez
arXiv:2610.05828v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities for public opinion research by enabling early prediction of survey responses, potentially redu...
By Dongryeol Lee, Weronika {\L}ajewska, Leonardo Perelli, Saab Mansour
arXiv:2608.22438v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Persona-conditioned large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate survey responses across diverse domains. However, apparent response...
By Taehyeon An, Jaehyeong Park, Donghyuk Shin
arXiv:2610.03998v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as synthetic personas representing survey respondents. Their validity as substitutes for particu...
By Khashayar Pourtaheri, Ahmad Zareei
The paper introduces Population Fidelity, an evaluation framework for assessing how well large language models (LLMs) represent human population attitudes. It focuses on three dimensions: group-level accuracy, between-group variation, and the structure of that variation. Using the framework, the authors replicate a prior study on machine bias and test cultural fine-tuning, finding that while fine-tuning improves overall alignment, it does not enhance representation of within-population differences.
By Neemias B. da Silva, Martin Lukk, Ali Sutani, Abhishek Moturu, Harris Yang, Daniel Silver, Matt Ratto, Thiago H. Silva
arXiv:2607. 26348v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as synthetic users, stand-ins for human respondents whose simulated answers feed product, policy, and market decisions.
By Zihan Chen, Di Zhu, Lei Nico Zheng