arXiv:2608.23299v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Memory-based anomaly detectors store nominal training patches and score test patches against this memory. A patch selected for coverage therefore becom...
By Joongwon Chae, Runming Wang, Peiwu Qin
arXiv:2608.23295v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Memory-based anomaly detectors store nominal training patches and score test patches against this memory. A patch selected for coverage therefore becom...
By Joongwon Chae, Runming Wang, Peiwu Qin
The paper introduces a training‑free, human‑in‑the‑loop anomaly detection framework that allows a domain expert to correct a PatchCore detector by editing its memory bank, without retraining or using gradients. Using only ten golden samples, operator corrections close a median 66% of the performance gap to a fully trained bank, improving 12 of 15 MVTec AD categories while harming none. The approach is evaluated with a rigorous held‑out protocol and shows that passive and active querying yield statistically indistinguishable gains, with a defect‑memory extension failing decisively.
By Ayusha Abbas, Saram Abbas, Kabita Adhikari
arXiv:2608. 15090v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Studies of industrial visual inspection commonly report the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the overlap between anomaly maps and defect masks.
By Jie Deng
ShiftSplit-AD is a method that separates domain shift from defects in visual anomaly detection by decomposing the residual matrix of DINOv2 features into low‑rank and row‑sparse components. The sparse component is used for scoring anomalies, optionally fused with the low‑rank part. Experiments on AeBAD‑S show that sparse‑only scoring raises image AUROC from 0.6780 to 0.7294 and AUPRC from 0.8052 to 0.8465, but it also lowers clean AUROC on MVTec categories and hurts Bottle localization, highlighting a trade‑off between filtering shift and preserving defect information.
By Muhamathu Ameer Ali Aacaas Muhamath
SafeRestore introduces a framework for certifying when an industrial image restoration should be automatically returned to a detector or require human review. It ranks five restoration candidates using action‑specific fitted scores, selects a threshold gate on tuning data, and evaluates the gate on a separate certification sample with two one‑sided exact binomial bounds—one for evidence‑loss incidents and one for excess‑activation incidents. In a retrospective study of 4,591 Carinthia‑S images, the protocol demonstrates auditable risk‑coverage behavior, with varying pass rates across different policies and morphologies.
By Shaoliang Yang, Jun Wang