arXiv Computer Vision
What Remains Normal? Clean Images Miss Useful Near-Defect Normal Patches for Anomaly Detection
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
Related stories
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 25
What Memory Composition Does Not Tell Us About Anomaly Detection
arXiv:2608.23295v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory-based anomaly detectors store nominal training patches and score test patches against this memory. A patch selected for coverage therefore becom...
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 25
When More References Hurt: Contamination-Aware DINOv2 Memory Banks for Few-Shot Steel Defect Detection
The paper investigates how to improve patch‑memory anomaly detectors for steel defect detection when additional industrial images may contain unseen defects. By filtering out the most suspicious 20% of patches from a contaminated reference bank and merging the remaining patches with a clean seed bank, the authors reduce contamination from 9.46% to 2.59% and achieve higher AUPRC scores compared to naive expansion or random removal. The method demonstrates that reference purity is a critical design factor and that unverified images can be beneficial only after explicit filtering.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 6
ProCon: Projection-Consistency Memory for Training-Free Anomaly Detection
Memory-based anomaly detection is attractive because it localizes defects from normal images without training a decoder or synthesizing pseudo anomalies. However, most memory methods still use the memory bank as a nearest-neighbor lookup table: a test patch is treated as normal if it has one nearby normal anchor.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19
Training-Free Human-in-the-Loop Anomaly Detection via Memory Bank Correction
The paper introduces a training‑free, human‑in‑the‑loop anomaly detection framework that allows a domain expert to correct a PatchCore detector by editing its memory bank, without retraining or using gradients. Using only ten golden samples, operator corrections close a median 66% of the performance gap to a fully trained bank, improving 12 of 15 MVTec AD categories while harming none. The approach is evaluated with a rigorous held‑out protocol and shows that passive and active querying yield statistically indistinguishable gains, with a defect‑memory extension failing decisively.
arXiv AI
Aug 11
Continual Visual Anomaly Detection on the Edge: Benchmark and Efficient Solutions
arXiv:2604. 06435v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Visual Anomaly Detection (VAD) is a critical task for many applications including industrial inspection and healthcare.
arXiv Computer Vision
5d ago
ShiftSplit-AD: Separating Domain Shift from Defects in Foundation-Feature Visual Anomaly Detection
ShiftSplit-AD is a method that separates domain shift from defects in visual anomaly detection by decomposing the residual matrix of DINOv2 features into low‑rank and row‑sparse components. The sparse component is used for scoring anomalies, optionally fused with the low‑rank part. Experiments on AeBAD‑S show that sparse‑only scoring raises image AUROC from 0.6780 to 0.7294 and AUPRC from 0.8052 to 0.8465, but it also lowers clean AUROC on MVTec categories and hurts Bottle localization, highlighting a trade‑off between filtering shift and preserving defect information.