arXiv AI By Tong Xie, Andrew Bai, Yuanhao Ban, Yunqi Hong, Haoyu Li, Cho-Jui Hsieh

When Distance Distracts: Representation Distance Bias in BT-Loss for Reward Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2512. 06343v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reward models are central to Large Language Model (LLM) alignment within the framework of RLHF.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
4d ago

Diffusion Reward Models

arXiv:2609.33803v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reward models underpin the alignment of large language models, yet the dominant designs reduce each prompt--response pair to a point estimate...

By Xiangyang Wang, Bingxiang He, Zeyuan Liu, Jiaze Wang, Ziqing Qiao, Yuxin Zuo, Huan-ang Gao, Cheng Qian, Wenbin Zhang, Ran Li, Youbang Sun, Ning Ding, Yuanchun Shi, Zhiyuan Liu, Chaojun Xiao, Chun Yu
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

Gradients Know What Outcomes Don't: Unlocking Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning with Gradient-Aligned Rewards

The paper introduces Gradient-Aligned Reward (GAR), a reinforcement learning technique that uses truncated backpropagation to generate a compact gradient vector for each rollout and compares it to an expert-anchor gradient via cosine similarity. This dense, reasoning-aware reward improves large language model chain-of-thought reasoning on math benchmarks and transfers to other tasks without domain‑specific data, while adding less than 9% computational overhead. GAR outperforms existing baselines such as GRPO on Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B models.

By Leqi Zheng, Jinbo Su, Fang Niu, Chaokun Wang, Weiping Wang, Jiajun Zhang, Shannan Yan, Jie Wu, Zhaolu Kang, Rong Fu, Hang Zhang
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Mitigating Reward Hacking in RLHF via Bayesian Non-negative Reward Modeling

arXiv:2602. 10623v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reward models learned from human preferences are central to aligning large language models (LLMs) via reinforcement learning from human feedback, yet they are often vulnerable to reward hacking due to noisy annotations and systematic biases such as response length or style.

By Zhibin Duan, Guowei Rong, Zhuo Li, Bo Chen, Mingyuan Zhou, Dandan Guo