arXiv AI By Pei-lin Li, Qingle Liu, Junyang Feng, Siyu Li, Sunqi Fan, Xin-Sheng Chen, Shuojin Yang

When Context Misleads: In-context Learning with Jurisdiction in Large Language Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper "When Context Misleads: In-context Learning with Jurisdiction in Large Language Models" introduces FakeContextBench, a benchmark of pseudoscientific claims across seven domains to test large language models’ ability to judge whether contextual information should dictate the answer. Experiments show that both commercial and open‑source models struggle with context authority and that standard ICL fine‑tuning can worsen susceptibility to misleading context. The authors propose Jurisdiction In‑Context Learning (J‑ICL), a post‑training framework that adds context validation to the objective, which improves benchmark scores and reality accuracy by significant margins over baseline models.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 16

Language Models Struggle to Use Representations Learned In-Context

The article examines whether large language models (LLMs) can effectively use representations they learn in-context to perform downstream tasks. Experiments with open‑weight LLMs on next‑token prediction and a new adaptive world modeling task reveal that these models struggle to deploy novel semantics defined in-context, even when such semantics are encoded in their latent representations. The study also shows that state‑of‑the‑art closed‑source reasoning models similarly fail to reliably leverage in‑context patterns, highlighting a gap in flexible representation usage.

By Michael A. Lepori, Tal Linzen, Ann Yuan, Katja Filippova