arXiv AI

Context Tuning for In-Context Optimization

arXiv:2507. 04221v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce Context Tuning, a simple and effective method to significantly enhance few-shot adaptation of large language models (LLMs) without weight updates.

arXiv AI
Jul 14

Extending LLM Context via Associative Recurrent Memory

arXiv:2607. 11614v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Extending the context length of large language models (LLMs) is critical for many real-world applications, yet standard transformers remain constrained by quadratic compute and linear memory scaling.

By Gleb Kuzmin, Ivan Rodkin, Aydar Bulatov, Yuri Kuratov, Lyudmila Rvanova, Mikhail Katkov, Ilia Sochenkov, Misha Tsodyks, Timothy Baldwin, Mikhail Burtsev, Artem Shelmanov
arXiv AI
Jun 30

Scaling Textual Gradients via Sampling-Based Momentum

arXiv:2506. 00400v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM-based prompt optimization, which uses LLM-provided ``textual gradients'' (feedback) to refine prompts, has emerged as an effective method for automatic prompt engineering.

By Zixin Ding, Junyuan Hong, Zhan Shi, Jiachen T. Wang, Zinan Lin, Li Yin, Meng Liu, Zhangyang Wang, Yuxin Chen
arXiv AI
Jul 13

Self-Guided Test-Time Training for Long-Context LLMs

arXiv:2607. 09415v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-context processing has become increasingly important for large language models (LLMs), but simply extending the context window does not guarantee effective utilization of long inputs.

By Xinyu Zhu, Zhe Xu, Xiaohan Wei, Yunchen Pu, Fei Tian, Chonglin Sun, Kaushik Rangadurai, Hua Zhi, Frank Shyu, Sandeep Pandey, Luke Simon, Yu Meng, Xi Liu
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 16

In-context Learning vs. Instruction Tuning: The Case of Small and Multilingual Language Models

The paper investigates whether in‑context learning (ICL) can replace instruction tuning for multilingual language models, especially as model size varies. It highlights the difficulty of obtaining high‑quality instruction data in multilingual settings and compares the performance of ICL versus instruction‑tuned models. The findings show that a performance gap persists between the two approaches, suggesting the need for further research to close it.

By David Ponce, Thierry Etchegoyhen