When Context Misleads: In-context Learning with Jurisdiction in Large Language Models
Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
The paper "When Context Misleads: In-context Learning with Jurisdiction in Large Language Models" introduces FakeContextBench, a benchmark of pseudoscientific claims across seven domains to test large language models’ ability to judge whether contextual information should dictate the answer. Experiments show that both commercial and open‑source models struggle with context authority and that standard ICL fine‑tuning can worsen susceptibility to misleading context. The authors propose Jurisdiction In‑Context Learning (J‑ICL), a post‑training framework that adds context validation to the objective, which improves benchmark scores and reality accuracy by significant margins over baseline models.
arXiv:2507. 04221v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce Context Tuning, a simple and effective method to significantly enhance few-shot adaptation of large language models (LLMs) without weight updates.
arXiv:2604. 27660v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Many real-world tasks require language models (LMs) to reason over complex contexts that exceed their parametric knowledge.
arXiv:2610.01054v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In-context learning (ICL) enables language models to perform new tasks from demonstrations without weight updates. However, every ICL inference requi...
arXiv:2609.00759v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) increasingly handle in-context learning (ICL) tasks where a long, novel context defines the rules, knowledge, and output s...
arXiv:2607. 02575v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models can perform new tasks without parameter updates through in-context learning (ICL), whose core mechanism is utilizing the support set for task induction.