arXiv Machine Learning By Marc Abeille, David Janz, Ciara Pike-Burke

When and why randomised exploration works (in linear bandits)

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2502. 08870v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We provide an approach for the analysis of randomised exploration algorithms like Thompson sampling that does not rely on forced optimism or posterior inflation.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 30

Randomized Exploration for Linear Bandits via Absolute Perturbations

arXiv:2606. 28616v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In stochastic linear bandits, the canonical Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) algorithm admits a simple frequentist regret analysis but can be computationally demanding, while Thompson Sampling (TS) is computationally attractive yet typically harder to analyze due to its non-optimistic nature.

By Toshinori Kitamura, Shuai Liu, Csaba Szepesv\'ari
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5

Exploration via linearly perturbed loss minimisation

arXiv:2311. 07565v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce exploration via linear loss perturbations (EVILL), a randomised exploration method for structured stochastic bandit problems that works by solving for the minimiser of a linearly perturbed regularised negative log-likelihood function.

By David Janz, Shuai Liu, Alex Ayoub, Csaba Szepesv\'ari