What Makes High-Magnification Knowledge Transferable? A Study of Cross-Resolution Distillation in Whole-Slide Imaging
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
arXiv:2606. 06864v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multiple instance learning (MIL) has become a standard paradigm for whole slide image (WSI) analysis in digital pathology, as it enables slide-level prediction without dense annotations.
This study investigates whether vision‑based models for surgical skill assessment learn representations that transfer across different scoring rubrics (GOALS and OSATS) using the LASANA and JIGSAWS datasets. By evaluating end‑to‑end training, Adaptive Sharpness‑Aware Minimization, and self‑supervised/contrastive pretraining, the authors find that models pretrained on JIGSAWS can transfer reasonably well to LASANA, but transfer to JIGSAWS fails, likely due to annotation inconsistencies. Control experiments with a Kinetics‑pretrained backbone show that task‑specific heads carry most of the skill prediction load, while the backbone provides general spatiotemporal features.
arXiv:2607. 14703v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multiple instance learning (MIL) has become the main paradigm for whole-slide image (WSI) analysis in computational pathology.
arXiv:2607. 09526v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models are reshaping computational pathology, yet their capabilities remain shaped by pretraining objectives, data sources, and spatial scales, fragmenting complementary expertise across separate backbones.
arXiv:2609.23561v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deploying efficient neural networks is essential in resource-constrained environments, yet compact models often sacrifice interpretability - a critical...
arXiv:2607. 11257v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pathology Foundation Models (PFMs) offer powerful Whole Slide Image (WSI) representations but suffer from massive computational costs.