arXiv:2608. 15574v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video question answering systems built on vision-language models often produce timestamped claims with high confidence even when unsupported by the cited frame.
By Yogesh Kumar
MiniVer‑V is a new benchmark for short‑video fact‑checking that contains 195 videos, each annotated with a supported, refuted, or insufficient verdict and 5,510 multimodal evidence units (visual keyframes, speech transcripts, and web‑retrieved sources). The authors propose a two‑layer verification framework that first checks claim‑video consistency using internal evidence, then determines the factual verdict with external corroboration, and employs a sufficiency‑driven greedy search to assemble only the minimal evidence needed for a confident decision. Using Claude Sonnet 4, the method achieves a Macro‑F1 of 0.510 with an average of 4.5 evidence units—about 16 % of the full set—while matching the full‑evidence baseline and improving detection of insufficient cases.
By Leran Chen, Lingnan Kong, Zile Cai
The paper introduces Mind2Web-Injection, a benchmark of 9,954 instruction‑screenshot pairs designed to evaluate whether vision‑language models (VLMs) use visual evidence when judging conflicts between on‑screen text and user instructions. Across six VLMs, models with similar overall precision can differ dramatically in Evidence‑Aligned Detection (EAD), revealing that verdict‑only metrics miss critical grounding failures. The authors also propose two training‑free interventions—ReadGate and CmdCompare—to improve evidence grounding and instruction‑command consistency, and argue for separate reporting of verdict correctness, evidence localization, and counterfactual responsiveness.
By Suyoung Lee, Myungsub Choi
The study investigates how false content in training data can influence language models’ downstream decisions even without explicit triggers. By comparing models trained on misleading versus truthful documents in a controlled decision task and a real‑world bushfire case, the authors find a gap between factual answers and the decisions derived from them: correct facts do not always lead to correct decisions, and removing an injected number does not eliminate the misleading narrative. The research highlights that data poisoning can subtly alter model behavior beyond what is detectable through direct probing.
By Lin Tian, Marian-Andrei Rizoiu
arXiv:2609.36572v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has been extended to Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), and perception-aware methods further e...
By Zhongan Bi, Kepeng Lin, Xuanang Gao, Yuhan Sun, Lianrun Zhang
arXiv:2606. 26904v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video reasoning language models implicitly assume that every input frame is equally reliable.
By Yangfan He, Yujin Choi, Jaehong Yoon