arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 2

LeNEPA: No-Augmentation Next-Latent Prediction for Time-Series Representation Learning

arXiv:2607. 00958v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time series are central to modern data mining applications, from industrial telemetry and server metrics to finance and physiology, yet time-series self-supervised learning often depends on view and augmentation choices that encode domain-specific invariances.

By Alexander Chemeris, Ming Jin, Randall Balestriero
arXiv AI
Aug 24

UpgradeBench: A Decision-Centric Benchmark for Upgrading Fine-Tuned LLM Specialists

UpgradeBench is a decision‑centric longitudinal benchmark that evaluates how fine‑tuned language‑model specialists should be handled when new base‑model releases occur. It covers four consecutive Qwen releases, a continuation checkpoint, six tasks, two model sizes, and OLMo checkpoints with known training lineage, and examines whether retraining, adapter transfer, or other recovery strategies improve specialist performance. The benchmark reveals that upgrade gains vary by task and release interval, that direct adapter copying is sensitive to pretraining distance, and that teacher relabeling can recover specialists without new annotations. "whyItMatters":"The study provides actionable insights into the cost‑effective management of specialist models across model releases, showing how to balance retraining effort with performance gains."

By Ye Chen, Weining Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 9

Conditional Transfer from Controlled Pretraining Mixtures to Code

The paper investigates how synthetic tasks influence language‑model pretraining by distinguishing diagnostic, teachable, and transferable signals. In a controlled setting where 70% of the data is general Python and 30% is a mixture of curated synthetic tasks, literature‑derived probes, and OpenCodeInstruct, 14 of 27 tasks show teachability, with curated tasks outperforming literature probes. Curated synthetic data provides conditional value: it boosts downstream performance when mixed with OpenCodeInstruct but is less effective when used alone, and a loss‑based scheduler can misalign short‑term loss reduction with long‑term transfer.

By Ohad Rubin