arXiv:2609.39702v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Adapting a language model to a specialized corpus means choosing which instruction-tuning tasks to train on under a fixed budget, and testing one choic...
By Nima H. Siboni, Vahid Rostami
Osprey is a target‑agnostic pre‑training method that bootstraps draft models for speculative decoding from existing small language models. By pruning to a shallow backbone, restoring language‑modeling capability with next‑token pretraining, and adapting via vocabulary alignment and distillation, Osprey reduces per‑target work to a lightweight adaptation step. Experiments show that a single Osprey backbone improves mean acceptance length by up to 22.7% and increases tokens per second by 17.5% across several large target models, especially on out‑of‑domain and multilingual data.
By Fengxiang Bie, Yuqing Jian, Yifan Yu, Zhongzhu Zhou, Zelei Shao, Ben Athiwaratkun, Shuaiwen Leon Song, Chenfeng Xu, Xiaoxia Wu, Tianyi Zhang
arXiv:2601. 22108v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Continued pretraining is optimized with fixed self-supervised tasks but selected by downstream performance, creating a coarse feedback loop in which practitioners evaluate checkpoints, change data mixtures or objectives, and restart runs, while individual updates remain blind to target capabilities.
By Shuqi Ke, Giulia Fanti
arXiv:2607. 22769v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The training efficacy of large language models (LLMs) is fundamentally constrained by the quality and composition of training data.
By He Zhang
arXiv:2609.10518v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: fMRI foundation models increasingly aggregate heterogeneous data across brain states, cohorts, and acquisition settings, yet pretraining domains are co...
By Junfeng Xia, Wenhao Ye, Junxiang Zhang, Jiayu Zuo, Mo Wang, Quanying Liu
arXiv:2608. 08989v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Public infant cry corpora are small, label-incompatible, and almost always evaluated one corpus at a time.
By Wu Hangyu
arXiv:2609.37169v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Mid-training equips pretrained large language models with specialized and reasoning capabilities, but the returns of this stage are bounded since add...
By Zhehao Huang, Changxin Tian, Qingyuan Yang, Kunlong Chen, Ziqi Liu, Zhiqiang Zhang, Xiaolin Huang, Jun Zhou
arXiv:2605. 12705v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: How can we train models whose post-trained capabilities survive subsequent fine-tuning?
By Lawrence Feng, Gaurav R. Ghosal, Jacob Mitchell Springer, Ziqian Zhong, Aditi Raghunathan
arXiv:2607. 01104v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In Large Language Model (LLM) training, data mixing plays a pivotal role in determining model performance.
By Zinan Tang, Yukun Zhang, Shaomian Zheng, Zhuoshi Pan, Qizhi Pei, Dingnan Jin, Jun Zhou, Yujun Wang, Biqing Huang
arXiv:2609.16229v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Machine unlearning aims to remove specific knowledge from a trained large language model (LLM) without retraining from scratch. Existing methods modify...
By Pingzhi Li, Jinhao Duan, Vaishnav Tadiparthi, Nakul Agarwal, Kwonjoon Lee, Ehsan Moradi Pari, Hossein Nourkhiz Mahjoub, Sijia Liu, Tianlong Chen
arXiv:2604. 26170v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Adapting large language models (LLMs) to a targeted task efficiently and effectively remains a fundamental challenge.
By Ting-Wei Li, Sirui Chen, Jiaru Zou, Yingbing Huang, Tianxin Wei, Jingrui He, Hanghang Tong
The paper compares two low‑budget methods for converting a 30B Mixture‑of‑Experts autoregressive language model into a diffusion language model. One method updates a subset of the model’s weights in‑place, while the other freezes the context tower and conditions on a frozen causal copy via cross‑attention. With only 1B training tokens, the frozen‑tower approach achieves a HumanEval pass@10 score of 71.60 versus 6.19 for the in‑place method, and retains 95% of the parent’s GSM8K and 99% of its MMLU‑Pro performance.
By Wentao Lu, Jesse Clark, Tianyu Zhu